ULIP « Archives of Policy Mantra Blog
Tag Archives: ULIP

Revival Sometime Away For Life Insurers

life-insurance-revival-to take-time

In the April 2012-February 2013 period, life insurance industry’s new business premium collection fell 6.1% to Rs 84,501.74 crores as against Rs 90,015.83 crores in corresponding period last year.

Insurers say that the segment would continue to see contraction, at least for the first six months of this financial year, owing to new traditional product guidelines and slow economic growth.

Private life insurer’s total new business premium collection for April 2012-February 2013 period stood at Rs 23,796.29 crores, a fall of 5.5%, compared to the corresponding period last year.

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has announced new guidelines for linked and non-linked insurance products. The guidelines have called for non-linked variable insurance plans (index linked plans) to be treated on a par with Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP). Insurers have been given time till June 30 and September 30 to re-file their group and individual products, respectively.

Insurer’s fear they may lose customers due to the fact the first few quarters would not see new products; this would hit new business premiums. This is because insurers would focus on re-filing products, rather than launching new ones. Hence, customers looking for variety may be disappointed.

However, some insurers are optimistic. They say that finalization of the guidelines had removed uncertainty in the industry. The industry will now have to sensitize customers about the changes. This may pave the way for positive growth. Since India is hugely underinsured, the prospects are definitely bright.

Insurers Can Now Invest More in High Yielding Corporate Bonds

funds

Policyholders are likely to get higher returns and bonuses on their traditional life insurance policies as the government has notified the changes to the investment regulations proposed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA).

This will give more headroom for insurers to invest in higher yielding corporate bonds.

The headroom for investments in the ‘AA’ rated corporate bonds has been created by clubbing the investment limits in government securities along with ‘AAA’ rated corporate bonds.

The composite investment limit for ‘AAA’ rated corporate bonds and government securities has been set at 75%.

Earlier regulations required insurance companies to put 75% of their debt market investments in ‘AAA’ rated instruments, excluding government securities.

It will create additional headroom of 12.5% for investing in higher yielding bonds. This will help insurers earn higher interest and they will be able to give better returns and bonuses in traditional plans to policyholders.

For investing in bonds rated ‘A’ and lower IRDA has capped the limit for life insurers at 5% and 8% for general insurers.

For general insurers, the IRDA has lowered the requirement of 75% of investments in ‘AAA’ rated bonds and government securities to 65%.

The IRDA has also restricted investments by insurance companies in their promoter companies to 5%. Earlier, insurers could invest 12.5% of the corpus of Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) in their promoter companies.

IRDA has allowed insurers to invest a maximum of 20% of the project cost in Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) in the infrastructure sector to increase the flow of long-term funds.

Will it be a Difficult Beginning for New IRDA Chairman?

IRDA

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) chairman, J. Hari Narayan has completed an eventful five year term. He will be remembered as someone who controlled the euphoria of insurers, came down heavily on mis-selling, cut agent commission but also saw the sector losing growth momentum because of a slew of stricter regulations.

New IRDA chairman is yet to be named. But experts believe that his priority should be restoring growth. Experts say that industry needs development to begin with. Regulations can come after IRDA has dealt with dwindling growth.

Following the stringent norms regarding Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) in September 2010, the country reported a fall in insurance density in 2011, a first since the sector was opened. There was an increase in insurance density for every year from 2001.

Similarly, insurance penetration had surged consistently till 2009 and slipped in the following years.

Insurance penetration and a deepening reach of insurance products, according to experts should be a continuing activity for the new chairman.

Insurance penetration is less than 4.5% and general insurance penetration is below 1%.

Perhaps, the most difficult task for the chairman would be to maintain a balance between customer welfare and insurer’s growth. Though J. Hari Narayan upheld the customer as supreme and based regulations on customer interest, those in the sector want the new chairman to uphold company growth as well.

Though products like micro insurance may be mandated by the IRDA chairman to serve customers, it is imperative to ensure the right mix in terms of prices and services of each product is maintained. Insurers say that this is required to ensure that their business interests are not hampered.

Insurance companies are looking at bancassurance as a channel of distribution to expand reach. At present, a bank is allowed to tie-up with one life and one non-life insurance company to sell its products. Insurers who entered the sector late lost on the opportunity. Hence, they are scouting for opening of the bancassurance architecture.

However, other institutions including Reserve Bank of India (RBI) have reservations about the IRDA model of letting banks act as agents. Hence, insurers fear that pushing these changes would be Herculean.

Areas such as catastrophe insurance are also expected to become a bone of contention between IRDA and the insurers. Offering mandatory insurance to cover catastrophic events and formulating a catastrophe pool is what some in the sector have been asking.

This has not been finalized, owing to a fear of it leading to a similar consequence as third party motor pool.

The equity investment cap for all insurers has been capped at 15%. While a separate equity investment limit of 30% for Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) has been permitted by the government, which owns it, the new chairman will have to clarify the IRDA’s stand on this matter.

Hari Narayan was open about his discomfort with this special status for LIC.

In life insurance products, after the regulatory changes, both ULIPs and pension plans are back to the market but volumes are still low. Experts say that a push from the regulator is needed. ULIPs are good products and insurers are hoping that new chairman will be able to increase commission on it for agents, so that they are incentivised to sell them.

However, while pending reforms might make it a difficult beginning for the new chairman, a lot of tedious work has already been completed by the outgoing chairman. Product guidelines, fixing the surrender charges for policies and altering the commission structure for agents, has been finalized and is on the way to become regulation. Similarly, the notification banning highest Net Asset Value (NAV) products of life insurers have been formulated and only needs to be gazetted.

Focus on Higher Commissions Adds to Insurance Mis-selling

Insurance Mis-selling

The concern expressed by finance minister P. Chidambaram earlier this week on the issue of mis-selling in the insurance industry has brought the issue of malpractices while selling policies to the forefront.

While on the one hand penalties have been imposed on insurance companies time and again by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) for issues including malpractices in policies issuances, lapse on the part of agents to sell policies with higher commissions has led to continuance of mis-selling.

Post the Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) reforms where commissions of agents were capped, insurers have noticed that agents do not want to sell these products. Due to low commissions, there is very low interest among distributors to sell these products and instead they offer other products to consumers, since the incentives are low. This may often be considered by consumers as mis-selling.

ULIP-related complaints accounted for 11,714 out of the total 309,613 complaints in the life insurance industry, according to IRDA annual report for 2011-12.

The report said that maximum complaints in the life insurance sector were related to malpractices and accounted for 34,799 complaints out of 100,770 complaints in unfair business practices 2011-12.

In the non-life sector, maximum complaints were policy-related, accounting to 38,076 complaints out of 93,155 complaints in 2011-12.

Among the various complaints filed with consumer forums, about 85% of them are against insurance companies.

Out of the total 3, 09,613 complaints in the life insurance industry, about 32% of them were under the category of unfair business practices.

In 2011-12, the IRDA annual report showed that sales related issues accounted for the maximum number of complaints in the life insurance sector.

While a number of measures have been taken, there are issues which need to be addressed, including concerns on persistency and mis-selling, said IRDA Chairman J. Hari Narayan.

However, insurers have different point of view, they say that every year about 50 million policies were being sold by the industry. The customer can be fooled once, but not always. It is not correct to assume that the high volumes in the industry is due to mis-selling. Since the volumes are high, even a few instances can show an exaggerated figure, which is not an appropriate representation.

General insurers are of the view that they are better placed in terms of mis-selling except health insurance segment; there was no major issue of mis-selling as it is easy to detect these cases in the general insurance industry. Health is a segment where there have been cases of certain coverage being promised and not offered at the time of a claim. But otherwise they are better-off.

Traditional Product Guidelines Likely To Be Out In 45 Days

guidelinesIt is expected that much awaited traditional product guidelines for life insurance companies will be out in next 45 days.

According to revised draft policyholders will get back as much as 50% of their premiums, if a policy is active for three years that means that a policy will have a minimum Guaranteed Surrender Value (GSV) of 50%.

Minimum GSV is a sum of guaranteed surrender value and the surrender value of any subsisting bonus already attached to the policy.

Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) already has such guaranteed surrender value.

Insurers say that GSV should have been left for the companies to decide. Minimum GSV will vary from one product to another in a company. So, it is not appropriate to mandate a specific value for it.

Since the cost of acquisition and execution for insurance firms are high, it will be difficult for them to operate, if the latest guidelines are implemented, prompting them to sell more traditional products than ULIPs.

These guidelines will also pave the way for Index Linked Insurance Plans (ILIPs). It will have similar structure as ULIP.

The draft has also given detailed specification on all products, death benefits and charges.

It is expected that almost all products would have to be re-filed when these guidelines will come into force.

Insurers will be given time till 31 March 2013 for group policies and 30 June 2013 for individual policies, to enable them to withdraw products from the market and re-file them, as per the new guidelines.

Standardization Rules Will Take Longer Time to Get Implemented

IRDAThe file-and-use mandate for 18 product categories identified by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) would take longer time to be implemented than expected.

IRDA will set up four committees to look into the product categories and it will take another year to be passed.

Product standardization had been considered for the file-and-use mandate, as product approvals in the industry was taking time. Due to this insurers were not able to offer products till they were approved. And hence, IRDA proposed standardizing some products that can be offered in 15 days of being filed with the regulator.

In case of non-linked life or pension products, both participating (that declare returns in the form of annual bonuses) and non-participating (that promise assured returns) have been identified.

Under the linked category, Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) and pension products and variable insurance products (life and pension products) where the benefits are linked to any external approved index have been identified for standardization.

Insurers are of the view that this would lead to lack of innovation as insurers will have similar kind of products for file-and-use. The whole purpose of file-and-use has been negated with a standard guideline for having a product under a file-and-use, since flexibility factor has been taken away.

LIC to Launch ULIP After Almost Two Years

ULIP-Unit-Linked-Insurance-PlanAfter nearly two years, country’s largest insurer, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) will launch a Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) with intention to take advantage of prevailing positive sentiment in the stock markets.

This would also help LIC to achieve its target of Rs 45,000 crores of new premium income in financial year 2012-13 and increase its market share.

At present, LIC has market share of 75% in terms of premium and 81% in terms of number of policies sold. LIC’s last ULIP –Samridhi Plus –, a guaranteed NAV plan, was launched in February 2011.

ULIP used to be a favorite investment option for investors pre-September 2010, when Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) came out with stiff norms. IRDA mandated minimum mortality cover and increased lock-in period from three years to five years. As a result, ULIPs took a huge beating and ULIP premiums, which accounted for 90% of first-year collection of life insurance companies, saw their share fall to less than 30%. As of 31 March 2012, share of ULIPs in LIC’s premium was 20% down from over 70% in pre-2010 period.

Private life insurers view this development of LIC as positive step for the industry. If LIC goes aggressive on ULIPs and launches new products, it will benefit the industry as a whole. LIC has greater reach and with its huge agency network it will be able to reach thousands of customers and explain the advantages of ULIPs. And people would be able to re-accept ULIP as good product for long term investment purpose. LIC’s these efforts would be able to bring ULIPs back to prominence in the market.

In addition, LIC will also launch a pension product shortly. LIC has filed both products with IRDA for approval and expecting approvals soon.

On the pension product front, LIC is the sole player till now. In January 2012, IRDA has said that pension products will have to guarantee an assured benefit in the form of non-zero rate of return that would be disclosed upfront. New regulations had led to slower approval of pension products which has resulted in dearth of pension products in the market.

Average Ticket Size for Regular Life Insurance Policies Still Below 2008 Levels

life insuranceAccording to a report from Kotak Institutional Equities Research, the average ticket size of regular premium policies has increased for private insurers to Rs 16,205 during April-September 2012 from Rs 13,710 in financial year 2011-12. However, ticket size continues to remain low from Rs 21,215 in 2008.

As equity markets have stabilized at higher levels, private life insurers have started to focus on selling ULIPs which has driven this increase in average ticket size for them.

Among top private life insurers studied in the report, the ticket size of HDFC Life Insurance reduced the most to Rs 37,817 in April-September 2012 compared with Rs 43,584 in FY’12.

Birla Sun Life witnessed the highest increase in ticket size to Rs 15,339 in April-September 2012 as against Rs 13,849 in FY’12.

Insurers say that average ticket size today is much low than what it was in 2008 because insurers at that time were mainly selling Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIPs), while they mainly sell traditional plans today. However, those insurers that have banks as distribution partners continue to focus on ULIPs.

Traditional insurance policies are longer tenure plans, say 15 years or more, and so people do not want to commit large premiums for a long term, while in case of ULIPS, policyholders can surrender the policy after five years. Earlier policyholders were allowed to surrender the policy after three years, with very low surrender charges, so people were ready to commit large premiums for ULIPs mainly because they could surrender them after three years.

Max Life insurance witnessed a significant increase in ticket size, which stood at Rs 26,557 in April-September 2012 compared with Rs 14,968 in 2008. This is because company continued to focus on ULIPs.

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) revised the regulations for ULIPs in September 2010, which reduced margins for insurance companies, thereby forcing them to lower commissions for agents. As a result agents started pushing traditional insurance plans that still offer 20-35% commission in the first year.

SBI Life to Launch Host of New Products Soon

SBI LifeSBI Life Insurance will soon launch four new insurance plans across savings, protection and pension platforms.

These plans include a family income protection plan, a monthly income savings plan, a traditional pension plan and a market linked plan (ULIP). These plans will be targeted at younger audience.

These plans will be available across SBI Life’s multi distribution channel including bancassurance through State Bank of India (SBI) branches, retail agency and institutional alliances.

During last financial year, company introduced several new plans that include Health Insurance – Cash, Variable Insurance— Flexismart, Traditional Savings – Smart Money Back and Immediate Annuity – Annuity Plus.

The company also launched first-of-its kind multi-lingual website across Indian financial sector.

During current financial year, company has added 39 new branches. It has also recruited 14,000 insurance advisors and 2,000 certified insurance facilitators.

IRDA Set to Revive ULIPs

IRDA-PersistencyIn a bid to revive Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) have increased commissions on ULIPS in par with traditional products.

The fortunes of insurance companies are largely linked to ULIPs, reduction in ULIP commissions lead to a sharp fall in premium collection.

Earlier, for ULIPs agents were given about 50% as commission of first year premium. And investor’s money was invested in equities with the hope of phenomenal returns.

But later in September 2010, IRDA capped commission on ULIPS and brought it down to single digits. Along with it, IRDA also introduced lock-in period for ULIPS. And since then there has been a sharp fall in the premium collection from ULIPs as compared with traditional products.

The share of ULIPs in an insurance company’s offerings has fallen from 85% of all premium collected at its peak to around 15% presently.

With no entry load in mutual funds, wealth managers, who derived their revenues from fees, shifted money from mutual funds to insurance. In the entire process the biggest loser was the investor, who without his knowledge was paying half the first-year premium to his advisor.

The current move of IRDA of hiking commissions in ULIPs to traditional plan levels can lead to some revival of ULIPs, which would mean more money available to the insurance companies to invest in the market. While the older investors who have burnt their fingers in an earlier ULIP may not be tempted, the newer breed of investors will be the sacrificial lambs for these agents.

If IRDA is serious about its mission of protecting interest of policyholders, it should allow companies to charge a higher premium for the amount allocated for pure (term) insurance plan and charge same level of fees as mutual fund charges for the amount to be invested in various savings instruments.