Tag Archives: Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority

LIC Selected as Default NPS Annuity Service Provider

PFRDA

Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has chosen state-owned Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) as default annuity service provider for subscribers exiting from New Pension System (NPS) and seeking withdrawal of accumulated pension wealth. It will be applicable for all variants of NPS.

PFRDA has empanelled seven Annuity Service Providers (ASPs) for providing annuity services to NPS subscribers.

While subscribers are required to select an empanelled ASP along with an annuity scheme from those offered by the chosen ASP at the time of exiting from NPS, PFRDA has now decided to assist subscribers by providing a default option.

The default scheme offers annuity – a policy by an insurer designed to provide payments to the holder at specified intervals- for life with a provision of 100% of the annuity payable to spouse during her-his life on death of annuitant.

Besides LIC, other ASPs include SBI Life, ICICI Prudential Life, Bajaj Allianz Life, Star Union Dai-Ichi Life and Reliance Life.

Under the provisions of NPS, a maximum of 60% of corpus accumulated at the time of exit, which is normally on the attainment of 60 years of age, can be withdrawn but a minimum 40% of corpus has to be utilized for purchasing an annuity from one of the empanelled ASPs.

The NPS was introduced for the new recruits who joined government service on or after first January 2004. From May 2009, the NPS was opened up for all citizens in India to join on a voluntary basis.

At the end of 2012, over 42 lakh subscriptions were enrolled with a corpus of over Rs 26,000 crores.

PFRDA Pushes Corporate to Offer NPS

PFRDA

The race between two state-sponsored retirement savings schemes seems to be picking up pace. With the mere Rs 6,500 monthly wage ceiling for mandatory provident fund contributions, the interim pension regulator, Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) is urging corporate employers  to join the National Pension System.

Most workers are already outside the mandatory PF net as minimum wages in most sectors is much above Rs 6,500 per month.

Instead, the NPS offers higher returns and is a much more efficient scheme for corporate employers, said PFRDA.

In a recent meeting with industry chambers, finance minister, P. Chidambaram, had also asked them to push their member companies to join the NPS.

Already, 350-odd companies, including Reliance group companies, Wipro, and ICICI Bank have begun to offer the defined contribution based pension scheme to their employees.

Compared to 8.25% interest rate offered by EPFO, the NPS gives average returns of 14% in equity and corporate debt and over 10% for government bonds making it more optimum choice for workers.

Moreover, tax benefits are also available for the scheme, which puts it at par with other similar retirement schemes.

Launched on first May 2009, the NPS for private citizens has over 2 crores subscribers and a corpus of over Rs 1,000 crores.

The low wage cut-off for compulsory provident fund deposits has already become a cause of concern for Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) that is concerned over dipping membership that is resulting in a fall in contributions.

With minimum wages in most states over the Rs 6,500 per month ceiling, formal sector workers have begun to slip out of PF net.

But analysts believe that it is early days for the NPS to claim to be a substitute for the EPFO as it is an untested product. Companies do not consider the NPS a substitute to the EPFO, but they look at it as a layer over and above the provident fund. They also say that substitutability will happen when there is portability between the two products. And given the overarching powers of the EPFO, no employer would suddenly want to stop PF contributions and become a defaulter.

PFRDA to Give Some Flexibility to Pension Fund Managers

PFRDAPension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) is planning to allow some flexibility to pension fund managers in valuing their portfolios to help them to increase valuation and show better returns.

Better returns may encourage more subscribers to join New Pension System (NPS), which has failed to garner substantial interest from unorganized sector that includes people ranging from sidewalk vegetable vendors to those employed as household help and in small business units.

PFRDA may soon give pension fund managers the option of only valuing their equity investments on a mark-to-market (MTM) basis) the practice of valuing investments at their current market price and not the price at which they were bought. Pension fund managers will be allowed to exclude their government bond holdings from this practice.

This will ensure that the valuation of the government securities portfolios does not come down when bond yields increase. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions; prices typically decline when interest rates are firm or are rising.

This move will help to improve the Net Asset Value (NAV) of portfolios managed by pension fund managers.

At present, pension fund managers have to mark their entire portfolio, including equities and government securities on MTM basis.

As government securities are generally long term in nature and held to maturity, PFRDA is looking to give an option to pension fund managers for not making some portions of government securities MTM.

The national pension scheme was initially launched for central government employees in 2008 and later extended to state government employees. From first May 2009, the scheme was extended to the unorganized sector.

The scheme for the unorganized sector offers the investors the option of choosing between three investment options including investments in predominantly equity markets, in only government securities and investments in fixed income instruments. Of around Rs 20,000 crores managed by pension fund managers for all the three put together, more than 95% is in government securities.

At present, there are seven fund managers under NPS including SBI Pension fund, UTI Retirement solutions and ICICI Prudential Pension Fund Management.

When portfolio is in Mark-To-Market, fund managers have to make provisioning in case of a fall in value. It is not done in the profit and loss account but in the NAVs.

Hence, pension fund managers say that there should be some distinction between short-term instruments like mutual funds and long-term investments like pension. In mutual funds lock-in is not for a long time period in contrast, in pension, people invest till they are 60 years of age.

DSP BlackRock to Join NPS as Fund Manager, IDFC Pulls Out

BlackRock Investment ManagersDSP BlackRock Investment Managers (P) Ltd has decided to join as fund manager to manage the New Pension Scheme (NPS) corpus, while IDFC has pulled out.

DSP BlackRock Investment Managers has decided to join NPS under the revised registration guidelines – 2012, and has also obtained in-principle clearance from PFRDA in this regard.

And IDFC decided not to renew its tenure as fund manager which was expiring on 31 October 2012. IDFC Pension fund Management Co Ltd was set up in April 2009 as a joint venture between Infrastructure Development Finance Company Ltd (IDFC) and IDFC Asset Management Company private Ltd (IDFC AMC).

DSP BlackRock Investment Managers, which oversees assets worth over Rs 30,000 crores for DSP BlackRock MF, will now join the existing managers –SBI pension funds, UTI Retirement Solutions, ICICI Prudential Pension funds management, Kotak Mahindra Pension fund and Reliance Capital Pension fund and LIC Pension fund (manages only funds of government employees).

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) appoint fund managers to manage retirement funds under NPS.

In the private sector of NPS, the upper ceiling of the investment management fees was recently fixed at 0.25% each year of the assets under management with effect from first November, 2012. This fee is inclusive of brokerage except custodian charges and applicable taxes.

Govt. Should Remove FDI Sectoral Caps: RBI

RBIReserve Bank of India (RBI) has urged the government to further liberalize Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) norms by doing away with most sectoral caps in order to cut reliance on debt flows to fund India’s record high current account deficit.

Further, RBI has asked for allocating debt investment limits on a first-come-first-served basis while giving preference to long term investors, replacing the current method of auctioning the right to invest in debt-essentially consisting of government securities and corporate bonds.

RBI has also proposed to increase the overall limit for investment in Indian debt, currently $60 billion per year. After allocating part of this to long term players such as sovereign wealth funds, the rest could be awarded on first-come-first-served basis to Foreign Institutional Investors.

The proposals, part of measures mooted by RBI to the financial stability and development council  (FSDC)–a body set up to co-ordinate the actions of financial regulators and develop the sector- are intended to improve external sector management by improving the longevity of foreign capital flows.

Finance minister is the chairman of the FSDC. FSDC also includes the RBI governor and the heads of market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), insurance watchdog Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) and pension fund regulator Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA).

RBI has also favoured uniform composite caps clubbing foreign investment by strategic and portfolio investors in a sector, to insure clarity in the overall FDI framework devoid of any opportunity for arbitrage.

Caps fixed at multiple levels – 26%, 49%, 51% and 74% – a separate sub-caps for foreign institutional or portfolio investors within the overall limits only deters long-term investors and did not make any practical sense after sector had been opened to foreign investments, this only leads to confusion and arbitrage.

Instead RBI has suggested retaining caps only for sensitive sectors.

Experts also point out that caps had lost relevance and specific guidelines should be used to address sectoral concerns. Instead of imposing FDI caps, the sectoral concerns can be better addressed by having operational guidelines or conditionality, approval and regulatory oversight.

The department of industrial policy and promotion, the nodal department that administers FDI policy, in June 2012 had put out a discussion paper making a case for removal of caps below 49% saying limits provide opportunities for arbitrage to unscrupulous Indian partners at the cost of consumers.

PFRDA to Allow New Fund Managers Next Month

PFRDAPension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) will allow entry of more fund managers next month even though applications for companies with foreign joint ventures could be delayed as the relevant bill is yet to be passed by parliament.

The existing players also have to renew their certificates of registrations after complying with the new guidelines.

The new guidelines mandates that, a company should have a minimum net worth of Rs 25 crores, should have a three-year profit record and managing assets of at least Rs 8,000 crores.

PFRDA will announce the names of new fund managers on first November, 2012.

In 2007, PFRDA allowed state-owned LIC, SBI and UTI AMC to set up pension fund companies and manage the long-term savings of government staff. After two years, PFRDA allowed four private players – IDFC Fund Management Company, ICICI Prudential Pension Fund Management Company, Kotak Mahindra Pension Fund Company and Reliance Capital Pension Fund Company.

These seven Pension Fund Managers (PFMs) now manages assets worth over Rs 20,000 crores of 3.75 million subscribers in government, private and unorganized sectors.

Many more banks, mutual funds and insurance companies were keen to enter the fast growing pension sector but were unable to do so because of restrictions on the number of players and selection criteria based on lowest bid for fund management charges.

In July 2012, PFRDA abolished the bidding process and announced a list of eligibility criteria to allow new players.

While the regulator’s eligibility criteria allows foreign participation directly or indirectly up to 26% as it is applicable for insurance companies, But it is expected that PFRDA may not allow joint ventures directly with foreign partners, unless PFRDA bill is passed by the parliament.

However, Indian mutual funds and insurance companies with minority foreign holding can be allowed as it has been the case for Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO). The EPFO recently approved Reliance Capital Asset Management to continue as a fund manager after it sold 26% stake to Japanese insurer, Nippon Life.

Earlier this month, the cabinet approved certain changes in the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) bill, which was introduced in parliament in 2005. The bill has proposed to empower PFRDA as the statutory regulator of the New Pension System (NPS), allow 26% Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the pension sector. The bill will be taken up for the parliament approval in the winter session.

Soon FM to Announce Slew of Steps for Insurance Industry

Finance Minister P. Chidambaram is going to announce a slew of steps for the insurance industry soon, which could be aimed at boosting premium income by way of innovative product launches, faster approvals and tweaking investment norms for insurers to ensure greater fund flow to infrastructure.

P. Chidambaram and officials of finance ministry had a two-day detailed discussion with Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) chairman J. Hari Narayan. And now after this discussion, finance minister will announce steps agreed upon with Irda chairman.

The some steps that are expected to be announced are:-

To raise the ceiling on infrastructure exposure beyond the current limit of 15%.

Allow insurers to invest in “A-“rated corporate bonds and mutual fund units of Infrastructure Debt Funds (IDF-MFs).

At present, life insurers are allowed to invest up to 50% into government securities, 15% in infrastructure bonds and 35% in “AAA” rated corporate bonds and equities.

IRDA may also speed up product approvals filed by insurers. IRDA has already prepared a road map for faster approval of products.

IRDA may also allow low-premium schemes to increase penetration. This is aimed at increasing insurance penetration, raise premiums and more products can be introduced at low premiums.

The finance ministry is trying to revive investor sentiment so that more long-term fund can flow into infrastructure, which in turn can boost the overall economic growth.

Apart from insurance industry, government is also urging Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) and Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) to ease investment norms so that more funds can be channeled to infrastructure.

NPS Garnered Rs 15,466 Crores till July 2012

PFRDAPension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has garnered Rs 15,466.28 crores under the New Pension Scheme (NPS) from central and state government employees, as of 31 July 2012.

Of this, subscriptions by central government employees stood at Rs 10,741 crores. And contribution of state government employees stood at Rs 4,725 crores.

NPS is a government-run retirement scheme for individuals, including those in unorganized sector. The NPS was made mandatory for government employees, except for those in armed forces.

The Death-Cum-Retirement Gratuity is also paid to the employees of central government under NPS.

The government introduced defined contribution-based NPS from January 2004 for central government employees. Later, it was extended to all in May 2009.

The minimum annual contribution in the pension scheme is Rs 1,000.

The interim pension fund regulator, PFRDA has been given powers to supervise and regulate NPS.

Govt. approved 49% FDI in Insurance and Pension Sector

fdi in insurance and pensionGovernment has decided to stick to its earlier plan of hiking Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Insurance Sector to 49% from current 26%. This is despite standing committee on finance rejecting the government’s proposal of hiking FDI limit in Insurance Sector.

However, recommendations of parliamentary committee are not binding on the government.

Finance minister, P. Chidambaram, reviewed the proposals in the insurance laws (amendment) bill and decided that FDI cap of 49%, as proposed, should be retained.

Finance ministry has also decided that FDI cap in pension sector should also be 49%. For this purpose, a specific provision will be inserted in Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) bill 2011.

Earlier, government was looking to spell out the foreign investment policy in the pension sector under, Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). There is no provision in the PFRDA bill on FDI.

The government had told the parliamentary panel that spelling out the foreign investment policy in the pension sector under FEMA was in line with most of the recent laws in the financial sector. However, parliamentary panel did not favour this approach for the pension sector.

EPFO approved RCAML’s 26% stake sale to Nippon Life

EPFO-1The retirement fund body, Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) has approved the proposal of Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd (RCAML) to sell 26% stake to Japanese insurance firm Nippon Life. The Deal is valued at around Rs 1,450 crores.

As per EPFO, it has approved RCAML and Nippon Life’s deal keeping in view the fact that there was no restriction at the time of calling the bids regarding the quantum of the foreign investment in the company.

EPFO’s approval was needed for the deal because as per the contract with EPFO, its fund managers can’t undertake any corporate action including Mergers, Amalgamations, Take Over, Acquisitions, and Divestment etc without the prior written approval of the trust.

Following the stake sale, Nippon Life will be entitled to appoint a member on the board of RCAML.

In July 2011, EPFO had appointed RCAML, State Bank of India, HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd, and ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd as its Fund Managers for three years to manage its corpus of Rs 3.5 lakh crores.

Competition Commission of India (CCI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has already approved the deal.