New Pension Scheme « Archives of Policy Mantra Blog
Tag Archives: New Pension Scheme

Kerala Govt. Relaxed Pension Norms

Pension

In a relief to hundreds of state government employees pursuing better jobs within government services, the Kerala state government has decided to give them the option to enjoy the benefits of statutory pension scheme.

While making the New Pension Scheme (contributory pension scheme) mandatory for those joining Kerala state government services from first April 2013.

The state government had also stipulated that those serving in any government department prior to that date and later joining another department through a fresh selection process will be entitled only to the New Pension Scheme.

The state government had received several representations seeking a relaxation of this norm.

Subsequently, the government decided to relax it, and made it optional.  This would be applicable to government employees, aided institutions and autonomous body employees who were entitled to the statutory pension scheme as per the Kerala service rules.

The option will have to be exercised within three months after joining the new post. While the retirement age under the New Pension Scheme is 60, it is 56 in the statutory pension scheme. The central government has also given such an option while implementing the New Pension Scheme.

An employee need not be denied a facility already being enjoyed by him once he looks for a better job within the government itself.

Pension Products Not At Par With NPS: Say Insurers

insurance-pension-vs-nps

Pension products might take a little longer to be counted among big contributors to the portfolio of life insurers. These used to be 25% of the total offerings and now down to single digit.  While life insurers have started introducing new products in this segment, insurers admit they are at a disadvantageous position, compared to the New Pension System (NPS) by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA).

In January 2012, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) had said that pension products would have to guarantee an assured benefit in the form of a non-zero rate of return, which would need to be disclosed upfront. Further, it said that annuity had to be bought from the same company.

These regulations had led to slower approvals of pension products. Initially, there was a dearth of pension products in the market. However, the gap filled after some private life insurers launched pension products.

Most life insurers feel that the guarantee element has made pension products different from NPS, while their fundamental structures are the same.

Unlike NPS, the service tax is applicable to pension products.

Insurers say that reasons which are restraining life insurers from competing effectively in the pension space include, insistence on annuity being bought from the same insurer, no partial withdrawals allowed etc.

With the current regulations in place, insurers are not comfortable offering non-zero guarantee for pension.

Insurers had shied away from introducing pension products due to the guarantee return requirement. NPS is not mandated to offer these returns. And that skews the pension playing field. So selling pension on the insurance platform is that much more difficult and requires the building of significant pool, say insurers.

Insurers say that they also have to maintain a conservative strategy in terms of investment, to give these non-zero returns.

Insurers say that until these challenges are addressed, pension growth is likely to remain muted.

Life insurers are also planning to take up this issue with the IRDA. Insurers will request the IRDA to make pensions at par with NPS.

However, insurers are hopeful that these issues will get resolved as they move ahead.

With the right nudge, insurance companies can make a significant contribution in pensions since they have the distribution backbone to reach these products to a large audience, say insurers.

PFRDA Tightens Audit Norms For Fund Managers

PFRDA NPS

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) have tightened rules for fund managers, making it mandatory to get their investments and fees certified by auditors. The move aims at raising accountability and lowering chances of malpractices with long term savings of employees.

The new rule mandates auditors to certify that PFMs’ investments have been valued in accordance with the guidelines issued by PFRDA and transaction and claims raised by different entities are in accordance with the prescribed fee.

Recently, PFRDA had decided to appoint a consultant to review the performance of pension fund managers (PFMs) as there were complains of accounts not being transparent.

Moreover, the subscribers were not able to trace where their money was invested and how much return it yielded.

The move gain significance in the wake of the regulator allowing PFMs to invest directly into equities with a cap of 5% in a single company.

PFRDA said that the balance sheet and revenue account of the New Pension Scheme (NPS) must comply with PFRDA’s guidelines and the accounting standards notified under the Companies Act.

The auditor now has to submit a separate report called NPS scheme-detailed audit report (NPS-DAR) along with scheme audit report accounts for a particular financial year.

The audit report will have to be approved by the board of PFM. The board of directors of PFM will also have to submit a ‘compliance report’ within two months of the receipt of detailed audit report.

NPS Fetching Near Double Digit Returns

New-Pension-Scheme

The National Pension System (NPS) is fetching near double digit returns, which is at least a percentage point higher than what Employee’s Provident Fund (EPF) or Public Provident Fund (PPF) offer.

NPS is a voluntary long term saving scheme for private sector but mandatory for those who joined the government from 2004.

In case of the private sector, the top performance was on offer for those who had a significant exposure to corporate bonds with all five fund managers –UTI, ICICI, Reliance, SBI and Kotak – offering between 13.4% and 15% over the last one year. Even since inception, the returns have been in the 8.89-11.94% range.

Corporate bonds are followed by government securities, where one-year return has been over 13.5% for all fund managers.

For equity, where maximum exposure of shares is capped at 50%, returns over the last one year have ranged between 8.45% and 11.56%.

The Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) has fixed the interest rate for 2012-13 at 8.5%. While government has announced that PPF would fetch 8.7% this fiscal. UTI’s Retirement Plan, a mutual fund scheme that has been around since 1994, has offered returns of 10.5% since its launch, while one-year return is 8.62%.

The flip side is that unlike PPF or EPF, the retirement corpus is subject to tax, although the government has promised to amend the law. But if you choose to use the entire amount to buy annuity, you may avoid paying tax.

Individuals who are not part of the government set up, can invest anything upwards of Rs 6,000 a year under NPS and can withdraw 40% of the amount when they turn 60. The balance 60% has to be used to buy an annuity or a pension plan from an insurance company that will earn you a monthly income for the rest of your life.

When it comes to private sector, the scheme was opened in 2009 but has been slow to take off as fund managers have not pushed it too given the low commission earned by them. As a result, a bulk of the fund, which added up to nearly Rs 29,000 crores at the end of March 2013, came from central and state government employees and NPS Lite which is meant for low income groups.

Over the last one year, central government employees earned over 12% and at least 9.67% since inception, depending on the fund manager.

For state government employees, one-year returns range between 12.8% and 13.3%.

Unlike the private sector, for government who join from 2004, 10% contribution to pension fund is mandatory with their employer providing a matching contribution.

PFRDA Allowed NPS Subscribers Lump Sum Withdrawal On Exit

PFRDA NPS

Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has allowed investors in the New Pension Scheme (NPS) to withdraw lump sum amount at the time of their exit, as against the current practice of ‘phased withdrawals’ every year.

The replacement of ‘phased withdrawal’ with ‘deferred withdrawal’ was taken after PFRDA received feedback from various stakeholders.

Stakeholders informed PFRDA that subscribers should be given a specific option to defer or time the entire lump sum withdrawal (maximum 60%) at the time of exit from NPS.

This would be a better option than forcing subscribers to choose a certain percentage each and every year while opting for the ‘phased withdrawal’ option, including the year in which they are exiting the system.

Under the ‘deferred withdrawal’ facility, the subscribers at the time of exit from NPS can exercise the option to defer withdrawal of eligible lump sum withdrawal and stay invested in the NPS.

However, no fresh contributions will be accepted and no partial withdrawals will be allowed during such a period of deferment.

The subscriber can withdraw the deferred lump sum amount at anytime before attaining the age of 70 years by giving a withdrawal application or notice.

If no such notice is given, the accumulated pension wealth would be automatically monetized and credited to his bank account on attaining the age of 70 years.

As on March 2, NPS manages a corpus of over Rs 28,400 crores of 44.93 lakh subscribers. Around 2 lakh subscribers are from the private sector while 27 lakh are from central/state governments.

Around 15.79 lakh subscribers are served by NPS Lite, which is designed to insure ultra-low administrative and transactional costs.

NPS has been extended to all citizens of India with effect from first May 2009.

PFRDA Capped NPS Equity Exposure At 5% in Sponsor Group Companies

PFRDA

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) have capped the equity exposure of New Pension Scheme (NPS) to 5% in sponsor group companies and 10% in other blue-chip companies. The move is aimed at preventing concentration of risks.

The PFRDA has also allowed Pension Fund Managers (PFMs) to park money in fixed deposits of more than one-year maturity of financially sound banks as part of their investment in fixed income instruments like investment grade bonds of corporate, infrastructure firms and municipalities. Banks should have a minimum net worth of Rs 500 crores and track record of consecutive net profit, a capital adequacy ratio of 9% and net non-performing ratio of less than 5% of advances in the last three years.

The change in rules has come amid demand from PFMs for widening the investment horizon.

Earlier, fund managers were allowed to invest only in equity index funds that replicated the sensex and Nifty. But the PFRDA had to change the investment rules as investing in equity indexes of mutual funds have become costlier owing to 1.5% expense ratio charged by fund houses.

In a notification, PFRDA has said that PFMs are allowed to invest in shares of companies which are listed in Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE) and on which derivatives are available or are part of the sensex and Nifty indices.

Investment in any equity stock of a sponsor group should be restricted to 5% or the paid up equity capital of all the sponsor group companies or 5% of the asset under management (AUM) of the NPS scheme, whichever is lower.

In case of non-sponsor group companies, the PFMs are allowed to invest up to 10% of paid up equity capital or AUM, whichever is lower.

Investment in Initial Public Offering (IPO) or Follow-on Public Offering (FPO) is not allowed. Also, investments in unlisted companies are not allowed.

PFMs are barred from short sale and carry forward transactions or engage in badla finance.

PFRDA has not raised the overall equity investment limit of 50%.

At present, the NPS corpus is managed by PFMs promoted by LIC, UTI AMC, SBI, ICICI bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and Reliance Capital.

The total NPS corpus has grown to around Rs 28,000 crores at the end of February 2013 since its inception in January 2004. The corpus has grown 77% on year-on-year basis to Rs 15,163 crores in 2011-12 and 83% in 2010-11.

The NPS initially enrolled new central government employees and subsequently rolled-out to employees in 24 states, PSUs, corporates and even the unorganized workers.

Higher returns than Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) and Public Provident Fund (PPF) have lured employees in private companies to enroll in NPS.

Since December 2011, about 400 corporate entities have enrolled new and existing staff under the NPS.

PFRDA Pushes Corporate to Offer NPS

PFRDA

The race between two state-sponsored retirement savings schemes seems to be picking up pace. With the mere Rs 6,500 monthly wage ceiling for mandatory provident fund contributions, the interim pension regulator, Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) is urging corporate employers  to join the National Pension System.

Most workers are already outside the mandatory PF net as minimum wages in most sectors is much above Rs 6,500 per month.

Instead, the NPS offers higher returns and is a much more efficient scheme for corporate employers, said PFRDA.

In a recent meeting with industry chambers, finance minister, P. Chidambaram, had also asked them to push their member companies to join the NPS.

Already, 350-odd companies, including Reliance group companies, Wipro, and ICICI Bank have begun to offer the defined contribution based pension scheme to their employees.

Compared to 8.25% interest rate offered by EPFO, the NPS gives average returns of 14% in equity and corporate debt and over 10% for government bonds making it more optimum choice for workers.

Moreover, tax benefits are also available for the scheme, which puts it at par with other similar retirement schemes.

Launched on first May 2009, the NPS for private citizens has over 2 crores subscribers and a corpus of over Rs 1,000 crores.

The low wage cut-off for compulsory provident fund deposits has already become a cause of concern for Employee’s Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) that is concerned over dipping membership that is resulting in a fall in contributions.

With minimum wages in most states over the Rs 6,500 per month ceiling, formal sector workers have begun to slip out of PF net.

But analysts believe that it is early days for the NPS to claim to be a substitute for the EPFO as it is an untested product. Companies do not consider the NPS a substitute to the EPFO, but they look at it as a layer over and above the provident fund. They also say that substitutability will happen when there is portability between the two products. And given the overarching powers of the EPFO, no employer would suddenly want to stop PF contributions and become a defaulter.

DSP BlackRock to Join NPS as Fund Manager, IDFC Pulls Out

BlackRock Investment ManagersDSP BlackRock Investment Managers (P) Ltd has decided to join as fund manager to manage the New Pension Scheme (NPS) corpus, while IDFC has pulled out.

DSP BlackRock Investment Managers has decided to join NPS under the revised registration guidelines – 2012, and has also obtained in-principle clearance from PFRDA in this regard.

And IDFC decided not to renew its tenure as fund manager which was expiring on 31 October 2012. IDFC Pension fund Management Co Ltd was set up in April 2009 as a joint venture between Infrastructure Development Finance Company Ltd (IDFC) and IDFC Asset Management Company private Ltd (IDFC AMC).

DSP BlackRock Investment Managers, which oversees assets worth over Rs 30,000 crores for DSP BlackRock MF, will now join the existing managers –SBI pension funds, UTI Retirement Solutions, ICICI Prudential Pension funds management, Kotak Mahindra Pension fund and Reliance Capital Pension fund and LIC Pension fund (manages only funds of government employees).

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) appoint fund managers to manage retirement funds under NPS.

In the private sector of NPS, the upper ceiling of the investment management fees was recently fixed at 0.25% each year of the assets under management with effect from first November, 2012. This fee is inclusive of brokerage except custodian charges and applicable taxes.

PFRDA to Introduce New Pension Scheme for Private Companies from November

PFRDAPension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) have approved a new scheme for corporate subscribers by the name ‘Corporate-CG scheme’. This scheme will have different investment model for government bonds.

Under the present New Pension Scheme (NPS) for corporates, the companies have been provided the option to select the government investment model under which asset allocation replicates the scheme as applicable to the central government employees.

However, this model has lost attractiveness after PFRDA allowed private fund managers to decide the investment management fee within the upper ceiling of 0.25% per annum.

Due to this differential fee offered by PFMs from first November, 2012, PFRDA has introduced new scheme with effect from first November, 2012, called ‘Corporate-CG scheme’. The scheme will follow the government investment guidelines issued from time to time.

The new scheme will be offered by only public sector PFMs, who have obtained registration under the PFRDA.

The system of distribution of funds among three PFMS, as at present, will no longer be available for the corporates under CG scheme and the corporates will have to choose only one PFM offering this scheme.

The existing three public sector PFMs–SBI, UTI and LIC offering CG scheme will introduce the new scheme ‘Corporate-CG scheme’ from November 2012, with units of face value of Rs 10 and initial NAV of Rs 10.00 per unit. The funds/assets in the existing CG scheme in respect of corporates will be transferred to the new scheme and proportionate units in the new scheme.

NPS Garnered Rs 15,466 Crores till July 2012

PFRDAPension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has garnered Rs 15,466.28 crores under the New Pension Scheme (NPS) from central and state government employees, as of 31 July 2012.

Of this, subscriptions by central government employees stood at Rs 10,741 crores. And contribution of state government employees stood at Rs 4,725 crores.

NPS is a government-run retirement scheme for individuals, including those in unorganized sector. The NPS was made mandatory for government employees, except for those in armed forces.

The Death-Cum-Retirement Gratuity is also paid to the employees of central government under NPS.

The government introduced defined contribution-based NPS from January 2004 for central government employees. Later, it was extended to all in May 2009.

The minimum annual contribution in the pension scheme is Rs 1,000.

The interim pension fund regulator, PFRDA has been given powers to supervise and regulate NPS.