Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority « Archives of Policy Mantra Blog
Tag Archives: Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority

IRDA To Share Information With Global Peers On Insurance Sector

share information

Strengthening its international co-operation, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has joined its hands with some of its global peers for sharing and exchange of sectoral information.

IRDA has become a signatory to the global supervisory cooperation and information exchange agreement under the aegis of International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS).

There are now 37 jurisdictions admitted as signatories to the IAIS Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MMoU), representing more than 54% of worldwide premium volumes.

The pact is a global framework for co-operation and information exchange between insurance supervisors. Besides, it sets minimum standards for signatories.

Through membership in the MMoU, jurisdictions are able to exchange relevant information with and provide assistance to other member jurisdictions, thereby promoting the financial stability of cross-border insurance operations for the benefit and protection of consumers.

Joining the MMOU will further strengthen the supervisory role of the IRDA in the home jurisdiction. Other signatories to this pact include Australia, France, Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom. IAIS represents insurance regulators and supervisors spread across more than 200 jurisdictions.

A Bank Should Have Only One Broking License: IRDA Panel

IRDA

A corporate bank should be allowed to have only one insurance broking license, a panel set up by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has said.

The committee, constituted by the IRDA to review the IRDA Broking Regulations 2002, submitted its report a couple of weeks ago.

As of now, banks are allowed to be corporate agent for only one insurer and there has been a demand to allow them to sell products of more than one insurer. The panel’s view assumes significance as a decision is pending with the regulator.

While pointing out that functioning of banks as insurance brokers would help increase insurance reach, it pointed out that there could be conflict of interest when a bank forms a broking firm as they are also promoters of some insurance companies.

The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) position on banks as broking firm also needs to be ascertained as it is the primary regulator of banks, the panel suggested. The broking arm of banks should be an independent, account unit to be manned by exclusive staff trained by institutes imparting insurance related education.

The banks should have a board-approved policy in place to address the issues related to conflict of interest and the same should be filed with the authority, it said.

On sub-broking, the committee said it should be allowed for all insurance products and not merely retail personal products. Small banks such as cooperative banks and regional rural banks should be allowed as sub-brokers. There should be cap of Rs 1 lakh premium on policies to be procured by the sub-brokers, it said.

On the whole, the panel was in favour of bancassurance channel. As they are separately regulated by RBI, there may be enhanced efficiency in insurance business and higher accountability to the policyholder as compared to the agency channel, it said.

Banks accounted for 11.25% of total new business premium collected by life insurers during FY’12. The share was 36% for private life insurers and 1.51% for Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC).

Standardisation Of Life Insurance Products Likely By August

Life Insurance

To fast track the product approval process, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has set the ball rolling by unveiling the standard parameters for five key life insurance products.

After discussions with the Finance Ministry last year, the IRDA had set up four working groups, with representatives from the life insurance industry and IRDA for standardization of 18 products.

Under the IRDA’s ‘use and file’ process, life insurers filing products based on standard parameters will automatically be deemed to have been approved after 15 days of intimating the regulator.

The working group committees were expected to come up with benchmark for products by April 2013, but parameters for only one product could be standardized. Hence, the actuarial department of IRDA has attempted to standardize five products, which will be released to the industry for their views shortly.

IRDA has said that expediting product approvals is a priority and the whole process of standardizing 18 life insurance products will be completed by August 2013.

IRDA Planning To Tighten Product Approval Process Further

IRDA

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is planning to tighten the product approvals process further.

As per the new norms proposed by the IRDA and intimated to the insurers last week, an insurer will now have to demonstrate how its product complies with the regulatory norms.

Insurers need to justify the financial viability of the products and requirement of such a product in the market before filing the product.

Filing of the product will be permitted only after getting the first round of approval.

The scrutiny process may involve detailed examination of products, wherein an insurer will have to justify how the product is suitable for the targeted customers and whether it meets their genuine needs.

Insurers will also be asked to establish the reasonableness in the death cover and the premium charged for the product.

The main objective of this approach is to protect the interest of all stake holders.

The proposal for a new product will also include

Reinsurance arrangement, pricing assumptions, target segment and investment philosophy of the product.

This will be applicable for both life and non-life products.

IRDA believes that these steps will help expedite clearances – to a couple of weeks compared with as long as six months earlier.

These steps will ensure consistency in the products and make the product approval faster.

All this means that insurers will now have to be cautious on proposing the products. Insurers will have to do a lot of homework and market research before floating the product.

With the new mechanism in place, the insurers will have to disclose the amount of business generated in each category of existing insurance products before proposing a new product under a particular category. The regulator will take into account the previous track record of the product before giving a green signal for product filing.

Recently, IRDA put out an exposure draft requiring life insurers to submit a product planner before the beginning of every financial year. This will give the regulator an idea of the number and type of products that will come up for approval during the year.

FM To Track Insurance Sector To Boost Growth

insurance india

Finance Minister, P. Chidambaram has decided to track developments in the insurance sector – life and general – very closely. He has asked the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) as well as companies, both in life and non-life space, to submit a status report indicating the progress, hurdles and new measures undertaken by them by the first of every month.

The move has been undertaken by the finance minister to ensure roadblocks are reduced while increasing penetration.

The finance minister would personally examine the sector’s status.

Sectoral growth has been slowing down as fresh policy sales plunged after the IRDA enforced a new set of norms in September 2010 for Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIPs). The norms benefit consumers, but reduce the profitability of companies and agent’s commission.

The finance minister has already underlined the need to revive growth in the sector. He has also initiated talks with the opposition leaders to introduce the Insurance Bill in the current session of parliament. The bill seeks to raise Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the insurance sector to 49% from current 26%, as the sector needs immediate capital of $5-6 billion to expand operations and increase penetration.

In the last few years, no global insurance company has entered the country, though Canada based Manulife, French firm Scor Global Life and South Korean Samsung Life insurance had shown interest.

The penetration level in the life and non-life segments is 4.4% and 0.76%, respectively.

IRDA Warns Public Against Fake Insurance Entities

IRDA

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has issued a warning to the public against payment of money as insurance premium to entities claiming to be insurers or insurance agents.

IRDA has advised citizens to check the entity’s veracity and the insurance arrangement promised, before making any such payment.

It has come to the notice of IRDA that a few entities under the banner of cargo carriers, couriers/logistic providers/freight forwarders/ transporters or involved in similar trade are charging consideration from their clientele towards their contractual liabilities, using the terminology ‘insurance’, thus creating an impression that they are either insurance entities or arranging insurance on behalf of their clientele.

IRDA said that an entity can function as an insurer or insurance intermediary only after a license/certificate of registration from IRDA under the relevant provisions of the insurance act, 1938, and the IRDA act, 1999, for such a business.

Only such a licensed entity can offer an insurance product and collect/charge an insurance premium.

IRDA Limiting New Products Each Year To 5 May Be Restrictive: Life Insurers

insurance india

With Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) asking insurers to file a ‘product planner’ each year, life insurers say that the IRDA’s proposal to limit number of new products every year to five may be challenging.

This, according to them, would be inadequate, since the product categories are varied and they would need to re-file products following new traditional product norms.

IRDA has asked insurers to indicate the number of products that they are planning to file each quarter. It also said that if the products to be filed in a financial year exceed five, the insurer should furnish the supporting market research, product-wise persistency for 13th month, 25th month and 37th month as on April 30th of the previous year. For 2013-14, insurers have been asked to submit the ‘product planner’ on or before 30 April 2013.

In February, IRDA published traditional product guidelines, which called for non-linked variable insurance products (index-linked products) to be treated at par with Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIPs). The insurers have been given time till 30 June 2013, and 30 September 2013 to re-file their group and individual products, respectively.

Insurers believe that apart from re-filing products under new norms, they have a large product category and merely five products a year would be restrictive.

Insurers say that due to regulatory changes and change in market dynamics, it is difficult for the industry to plan a product calendar.

Depending on the size of the life insurance company, approximately 8 to 10 products are filed by insurer each year, in the area of individual, group, health and pension among others. If the products to be filed are capped at five per year, insurers would not be able to file more than one product in each category.

Insurers also say that this may be a constraint for new insurance companies, who do not have a complete product portfolio. Some exceptions need to be made for them, to enable them to file more than five products each year.

While this decision may expedite product approvals in the long run, implementing it this year would be a difficult task for insurers.

There is yet, no clarity whether riders would be included in this planner, as a separate product. If riders are included as separate products, it would be more difficult to file for new products, since insurers introduce additional riders on existing products.

Life insurers are expecting some modifications in this decision, to boost their business. Insurers say that they would prefer a mechanism where the regulator puts a limit of five products a year in the individual category. Group products and riders should be kept out of this.

Further, insurers are also hoping that IRDA does not put a mandatory limit of five products. IRDA should define a range of number of new products (not riders) to be filed every year that companies should adhere to. A definitive limit on the number of products would be detrimental to the industry.

Insurers Asking For More Hikes In Third Party Premiums

Third Party Motor Insurance

Vehicle owners may be heaving a sigh of relief as third party premium rates went up only 20% and not 35-60% as originally proposed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA). But, insurance companies say that there should be more hikes in premiums to sustain the business in the motor segment. The industry was expecting increase in the range of 50-80%.

Last month, IRDA had proposed to increase motor third party premium rates by an average of 35% for vehicles, including private cars and commercial vehicles from first April 2013. However, recently it announced an overall percentage increase in the motor third party portfolio of 18.9% from first April 2013. This decision was taken keeping in view the interests of the customers and the need of the insurance firms.

Till April 2012, India had a system of commercial third party pool, which worked on the concept of loss-sharing by all insurers. In this arrangement, the third party premium collected by all non-life insurers for commercial transport and the claim incurred are given back to the insurers as a function of their overall general insurance market share. Due to the high claim ratio, insurers faced high losses in the motor portfolio.

This was replaced by a declined risk pool. In this, insurers were given the right to refuse or decline third party insurance if it found it too risky and asset to underwrite. The declined vehicles would then be given an insurance cover by another insurer. However, the risk would be transferred to the declined risk pool.

Insurers say that the hikes in the exposure draft itself were insufficient and they would keep making representations to the IRDA to have adequate pricing in the motor segment.

Insurers say that rates on an average has been increased up to 20% across various classes of vehicles and is less than is what is required to make the third party insurance viable for commercial vehicles. The rate increase should have been higher to insure the general insurance industry does not bleed.

De-tariffing this segment has also been suggested to reduce losses and achieve underwriting profitability.

Customers would also benefit if the motor third party segment de-tariffed. This is because, good (lesser risky) customers would be able to benefit from lower prices and bad (risky) customers would have to pay higher premiums. Currently, good customers are subsidizing the bad customers.

While customers would have to pay higher premiums from first April, the impact would not be high, according to experts. Motor third party premium only constitutes 10% of the overall motor policy package. Hence, with an average 20% hike, there would only be a 2% impact on the end-price.

IRDA Fast Tracks Product Approval

Approval in 10 days

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is hard at work to expedite product approvals. IRDA has promised insurers to give product approvals within ten days.

The plan involves doing away with the practice of communicating through letters (a major reason for delays) and getting queries whatsoever answered over telephone.

The IRDA has promised for quick approval of products as insurers have to re-file the whole product basket to comply with new regulations.

Some pure insurance and other traditional plans complying with the new set of guidelines are set to get approval in a week’s time.

All insurers have started filing products soon after the guidelines got approved by Insurance Advisory Council.

IRDA rolled out the new norms for product design earlier this month. The guidelines have stipulated short deadlines of July and October 2013 for insurers to withdraw the existing products and float new sets of products.

By and large, the new portfolio of insurers will have 50% traditional plans and 30% unit-linked plans, with others bringing up the rest.

Meanwhile, following a representation given by the industry, the IRDA is also considering a setting up a four-member committee to review some provisions in the existing regulations that could hit the players. These include reviewing the commission structure for the sales through the bancassurance channel, including ‘credit life’ products, or policies which are bundled with loans given by banks. Currently, the commission payable to banks is capped at Rs 50,000 which hurts companies having more than one promoter bank.

LIC Open To Buying Over 15% Stake with Govt. Nod

LIC

Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC)  has said that it will stay within the 15% limit laid down by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) for equity investments in companies but might buy a higher stake if it was to spot a good opportunity.

LIC said that it always go to government and put before them its requirements. They have been good enough to give it clearance when it was required. And in future if it needs to cross 15% and if it approaches the government then it is confident that it will get the clearance.

LIC also denied being labeled the government’s bailout agency. It said that all of LIC’s investment decisions are based on its own assessment of market condition and the fundamental of the company. It also said that it is not in the business of bailing out. It take a very reasoned decision before entering the market and wherever it get a good opportunity, it participate.

LIC will set aside Rs 30,000 crores for equity investments in the next financial year. Equity investments typically constitute roughly 10% of the investment corpus of LIC.

LIC is expecting to invest around Rs 2.25-2.3 lakh crores in financial year 2013-14.

In FY’12, LIC had made total investments to the tune of Rs 1.95 lakh crores and in current financial year it will cross Rs 2 lakh crores.

In recent times, LIC has bought big chunks of shares in stake sales of government-owned companies, at times when other investors have not found the issue attractively priced or fundamentals strong enough. For instance, it bought into Hindustan Copper and NMDC this year, which fetched the government Rs 6,700 crores. Last fiscal, it picked up a large chunk of ONGC, buying nearly all the Rs 12,000-crores worth of shares on sale.

As per the latest guidelines laid down by the IRDA in February 2013, an insurance company with a controlled fund above Rs 2,50,000 crores will be allowed to take up to 15% equity stake in any single company.

The controlled fund is the total corpus of traditional policies and policyholder funds held by an insurer.

LIC’s controlled fund stood at around Rs 13 lakh crores as of 31 January.

Last year, finance ministry has pointed that as per LIC act 1959, the LIC is permitted to increase shareholding in a single company to 30%. However, the ministry is yet to come out with a proper regulation or guideline in this matter.