Catastrophe « Archives of Policy Mantra Blog
Tag Archives: Catastrophe

GIC Re Hopes To Post Profit In FY’13

General Insurance Corporation of India

General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC Re), the national reinsurer which had reported a loss of Rs 2,468 crores in FY’12, would be registering a net profit of more than Rs 1,000 crores for FY’13 on the back of profits from the domestic operations and a claims-free year.

GIC Re would be announcing its financial result at the end of this month.

During 2012-13, GIC Re has been cutting its exposure in loss making segments including its topline in the international operations, cutting high commission for insurance companies on the domestic treaty business which are going to reap good results.

FY’12 was an exceptionally a bad year for GIC Re as there were five major international catastrophes that occurred during 2011, such as the earthquake in Japan, floods in Thailand, Australia and New Zealand which wiped away its profits besides the provisioning for motor third party pool. Fortunately, in 2012-13, there were no major catastrophes except the Hurricane Sandy Storm to which its exposure was very negligible, therefore the company would be posting profit for FY’13 including underwriting profits.

For FY’12, GIC Re had an underwriting loss of over Rs 4,000 crores.

During 2012-13, GIC Re launched a restructuring exercise of it international business and worked towards pruning the loss making businesses. As a result, going forward, international business will see a downward trend in topline but an increase in profitability.

For 2012-13, the domestic operations of the reinsurer contributed 60% of the gross premium, while the remaining 40% was from foreign operations.

Till last year, domestic operations was not making profit due to a high commissions paid by GIC Re on treaties that had a high Incurred Claims Ratios (ICR). Therefore, the company took several small steps to correct these practices. GIC Re linked the commission to the performance of the treaty. So if the incurred claim ratio was low in the domestic treaty business, it rewarded the insurer with a high commission rate which helped increase its profitability.

GIC Re pays a commission ranging from 5-50% to insurance companies on treaty businesses. Treaty reinsurance is a method of reinsurance in which the insurer and the reinsurer formulate and execute a reinsurance contract. The reinsurer then covers all the insurance policies coming within the scope of that contract.

Also, with the insurance regulator halving the requirement of compulsory ceding of reinsurance business by domestic non-life insurance companies to GIC Re from 10% to 5%, profitability of the reinsurer is likely to improve.

Reinsurers Worldwide Reached Total Capital of $505 Billion in 2012: Study

Reinsurance

The total capital of the world’s reinsurers increased by an estimated 11% during 2012 to reach a record $505 billion, according to Aon Benfield’s latest aggregate study.

Aon Benfield, the reinsurance brokerage arm of Aon Plc, studied financial reports of 31 leading reinsurers and found that their capital increased by 12% to $313 billion by the end of 2012.

This increase was driven primarily by net income of $29.5 billion and $15.9 billion of unrealized capital gains, noted Aon Benfield.

All 31 reinsurers covered by the Aon Benfield Aggregate Report reported profits for 2012, with an overall pretax profit of $35.7 billion, up from $15.6 billion in 2011.

The property/casualty combined ratio of the 31 reinsurers studied was 92.6% for 2012, down from 105.1% in 2011.

The contribution to the combined ratio of catastrophe losses in 2012 was 7.5 percentage points, compared with 20 percentage points in 2011.

Some 90% of catastrophe losses recorded in 2012 were from the United States, with losses from superstorm Sandy and US drought and resultant crop-related losses two of the largest contributors, noted Aon Benfield.

The contribution of favourable development of prior year’s reserves to the combined ratio was 4.3 percentage points in 2012, down from 5 percentage points in 2011.

Global Reinsurance Sector Making Financial Gains

Swiss Re buildingThe global reinsurance sector continues to regain its financial footing this became evident by two reports released, one by A.M. Best and another by Aon Benfield.

According to a report by Oldwick, N.J.-based ratings firm A.M. Best, reinsurance companies show resilience under weight of catastrophes, economic woes, it also said that reinsurance sector stood fast on pricing.

In the wake of 2011, the reinsurance industry’s focus predictably returned to opportunities for improved pricing and capacity allocation. As investment yields are at all-time low, the underwriting profitability is critical to organic growth in earnings and capital.

Best also found some discrepancies by region, such as European reinsurers with significant life operations faired better than Bermuda based reinsurers. Bermuda while accepting broad spectrum of risks, is predominantly a property catastrophe market and therefore more vulnerable to catastrophe shock losses, regardless of where they occur.  So, while underwriting performance for both European and Bermuda segments was comparable, the impact on capital by company indicates that Bermuda-based companies absorbed larger relative share of shock losses in 2011 than did the Europeans.

The report also ranked top 50 reinsurers by gross premium written. Munich based Munich Reinsurance Company ranked first with $21.44 billion in non-life premium and Zurich based Swiss Re ranked second with $17.18 billion in non-life premium.

According to a report by Aon Benfield Aggregate, from the London based reinsurance intermediary and unit of Aon P.L.C., sector as a whole continued to grow in the first half of 2012. As of 30 June 2012, the capital in the sector increased 5% to $480 billion.

The 31 companies comprising the aggregate also displayed a marked improvement in underwriting collective combined ratio of 90.1%, down from 117.8% in the first half of 2012. Gross premium also raised for the group, totaling $92.0 billion in the first half of 2012, an increase of 6.0% relative to the same period a year ago, said report.

Report also cited that New York based Alleghany Corp., witnessed a biggest increase in premium volumes. Its gross premium written increased 212% in first half of 2012 compared to corresponding period last year due to March acquisition of Translantic holding Inc.

On the contrary, Luxembourg based Flagstone reinsurance holding’s gross written premiums fell by 45% as it seeks to reduce its catastrophe exposure.

 

Source: Business Insurance

Insurance Linked Securities Taking Larger Role in Catastrophe Reinsurance: Willis

WCMA Hurricane SeasonAccording to a report by Willis Group Holding P.L.C.’s Willis capital markets and advisory division, the catastrophe reinsurance market may be about to undergo a significant strategic development.

According to Willis’ latest insurance linked securities market update report, private unlisted vehicles as well as specialist independent catastrophe risk funds are likely to gain a larger share of the catastrophe risk market in collateralized form over the medium term.

Source: Business Insurance

Click here for report

Global Reinsurers Introducing Riders in Their Arrangements with Domestic Insurers

ReinsuranceAfter bearing record claims on account of natural catastrophes last year, global reinsurers this year have imposed riders in their arrangements with domestic insurers to curtail their losses.

Riders that are introduced by reinsurers to cut losses include loss corridor. Loss corridor refers to a mechanism, whereby, ceding company (primary insurer) has to assume the part of the claims losses into its own balance sheets. Loss corridor is expressed as percentage of the premium collected.

As per loss corridors, foreign reinsurers will share claims only up to 100% of the premium collected. At least 50% of the losses above the premium collected by the reinsurers would have to be borne by the primary insurers themselves.

These loss corridors are introduced from current financial year itself. Before this there were no such arrangements.

Primary insurers cede a part of the premiums collected to the reinsurers as a risk sharing mechanism. This process helps in restricting the liabilities of the primary insurers.

Insurers hold different views on the introduction of loss corridor by the reinsurers, as some insurers say that it is a prudent step as it will give the reinsurers some certainty of outflows while some other say that it is a punitive move as it will penalize those insurers whose portfolio is heavily loss-making. This move will discourage primary insurers from aggressive underwriting.

Foreign reinsurers that are participants to treaty business with Indian insurers include French re-insurer Scor Re and Zurich based Suisse Re.

Not only foreign reinsurers are imposing riders on insurers but India’s only reinsurer, General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) has also introduced event limits in its treaty contracts with primary general insurers.

Last fiscal, general insurers collected premiums of Rs 59,000 crore. Insurers ceded at least 20% premiums to the reinsurers. And of this at least 10% was paid to GIC as reinsurance premium, as mandated by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) and rest 10% was paid to foreign reinsurers. However, in the case of private insurers ceding was higher due to lower capital.

As per insurers despite tightening of the contractual terms between reinsurers and insurers there will be no impact on pricing however, underwriting loss will eventually pressure the final tariffs.

Insurance Industry Proved Highly Effective in Dealing with Catastrophic Losses: Swiss Re

Swiss-Re-logoAccording to the report by Swiss Re, insurance industry proved highly effective in dealing with the last year’s record insured loss of $116 billion stemming from the catastrophes and man-made disasters.

 

As per Swiss Re’s sigma report on natural catastrophes and man-made disasters, last March’s earthquake of Japan resulted in $35 billion in insured losses, which made it the most expensive earthquake on record. Earthquake that destroyed portions of Christchurch in New Zealand in February 2011 was the third most expensive earthquake, which resulted in insured losses of about $12 billion. And floods in Thailand caused in estimated $12 billion in insured losses.

 

Despite record losses and challenging financial environment of 2011 insurance industry played an important role in post-disaster recovery financing, bringing much needed funds to effected population, business and governments.

 

However, report also warned of increasing risk accumulation particularly in emerging markets.

India Inc might had to Shell Out More Premiums to Renew their Insurance Policies

Reinsurance lossesFrom April 2012 India Inc might have to shell out more to renew their insurance policies as global reinsurance rates are set to rise by 20-25%. Global reinsurers such as Swiss Re and Munich Re who has faced record catastrophe losses in 2011 are demanding more for insurance covers in loss-effected areas.

 

Buyers of global catastrophe programmes and business interruption covers are faced with lower limits, higher prices and request for more information, following tough reinsurance renewals in January.

 

Reinsurers are insisting on a cap on single limit covers of a say Rs 25 crore for single incident. Unlimited covers are not available due to high loss ratios.

 

Reinsurers are also asking insurers to provide more disclosures in terms of profitability, capacity and loss ratios of portfolios.

 

In western countries Reinsurance programmes begins from First January while in Asia-pacific it begins from first April.

 

For Indian corporates it has already started to show its impact as premium for country’s biggest insurance policy which is held by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) is likely to be increased by 15-20%. Last year ONGC had paid $25-27 million for covering assets worth $32.6 billion.

 

General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC), the designated domestic reinsurer has taken a hit of Rs 1,800 crore on its networth due to unprecedented claims arising from these global catastrophes.

 

Last year in particular was the worst year for the insurers due to major catastrophes across the world such as tsunami and earthquake in Japan and floods in Australia and Thailand.

 

Economic losses on account of global catastrophes are pegged at $370 billion. In 2011 insurers took a hit of $116 billion against $45 billion in 2010.

 

Typically, under reinsurance treaties, reinsurance support is around 70% of the risk for the cover below Rs 1,000 crore and for larger covers 90% of the risk is reinsured with global reinsurers.

GIC Re Faces Hit of Rs 1,820 crore in Networth

General-Insurance-Corporation-of-IndiaGeneral Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) has to face the hit of Rs 1,820 crore in its networth due to unprecedented claims on account of catastrophes in Japan, U.S.A., New Zealand, Thailand and Australia. And worsening the situation of GIC, 90% of the risks did not have reinsurance support that usually given by global reinsurers.

 

Total claim arising out of all these catastrophes is around Rs 2,050 crore of which total reinsurance cover taken by GIC is around Rs 230 crore that means nearly 90% of the risks were retained by GIC.

 

This is the worst year for GIC in terms of net claims which have surpassed the Rs 650-750 crore net claims that rose due to the Mumbai floods in 2005. Japan faced the worst natural disaster in this financial year with earthquake and tsunami and consequent break out of fire which lasted for two weeks. Global reinsurers pegged the total economic losses in Japan close to $409 billion. Economic losses of earthquake in New Zealand and floods in Australia were pegged at $50 billion. In October floods hit Thailand which caused the economic loss of $400 billion.

 

Total claims from Thailand floods were around Rs 1,200 crore or $240 million and for this exposure GIC Re have reinsurance cover of Rs 137.5 crore or $27.5 million. This implies that for Thailand alone GIC will have net loss of Rs 1,062 crore or $212.5 million.

 

For the Japan’s earthquake and tsunami GIC Re has to pay the claim of $120 million and for this exposure it has reinsurance of $5.2 million. That means it has to take the hit of $115 million on its books.

 

Total claims from New Zealand’s earthquake and Australia’s floods are around $40 million and for this exposure GIC Re has reinsurance of $12.5 million. This implies that it has to bare the loss of Rs 27.5 million. Similarly it has total claims of $10 million from USA’s hurricanes of which $1 million were reinsured that means it had to bare the loss of $9 million.

 

Finance ministry has initiated probe into the books of GIC Re to see if retention limits have been violated. Retention limit per exposure is generally capped at 5% of the net worth.

 

To cover its foreign businesses GIC purchases mostly three types of covers, GIC foreign programme, GIC Japan programme and GIC USA programme. GIC foreign programme includes reinsurance support for all countries except Japan and USA. Total reinsurance annually purchased by GIC Re is around Rs 500 crore. For Japan and USA covers GIC Re purchases the reinsurance covers of Rs 25 crore and Rs 5 crore respectively.

 

For FY’11 GIC Re reported the net profit of Rs 1,033.4 crore. It reported the net premiums of Rs 10,212.6 crore. Overseas business contributed 40.3% to the total premiums of GIC Re. Net worth of GIC Re in FY’11 stood at Rs 9,820 crore whereas, free reserves stood at Rs 9,390 crore.

Hike in Reinsurance Rates may Impact Your Premiums

Reisurance rate hikeIndian general insurance companies have delayed finalization of reinsurance treaties for the next financial year as due to the last year’s catastrophic losses premiums are set to rise. These delays are not peculiar to India, it is happening globally.

 

Another reason for the delay is that Indian insurers have to still finalize their retentions. Retention implied the amount of the liabilities that can be retained by the insurers on their balance sheets.

 

This year reinsurers are demanding higher retentions by the domestic insurers because they had to suffer higher losses last year on account of Japan’s tsunami, New Zealand’s earthquake, and Australian and Thailand floods.

 

All the public sector general insurers together reinsure at least 30% of their liabilities with global reinsurers that means 30% of their premiums are passed on to reinsurers and. In the event of claim being lodged it becomes reinsurer’s liability. However, private sector general insurers reinsure their 50% liabilities with global reinsurers.

 

Higher retentions implied that premiums will substantially harden where risk covers are largely reinsurance driven. This included risk covers high value sectors, including petroleum and power, are already struck hard by increases in input costs.

 

Primary insurers are expecting that for next year premiums rates will be increased or deductibles will go up. Deductibles increase implies that customers themselves have to observe the higher quantum of risk directly on their own books. Premiums are likely to go up by 150 basis points on every Rs 1,000 of sum assured.

 

Catastrophic premiums might increased by 20-25% for the insurers.

 

Among the companies who are likely to see the hike in premiums includes Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), last year ONGC had paid a premium of $28 million for the risk cover of $33 billion.

 

For next financial year domestic reinsurer General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) is also expected to cut back on providing risk covers to the sectors that have high claims. At present at least 10% of the premiums would have to be ceded to GIC. Finance ministry, who is the single stakeholder in GIC, does not want that GIC should accept loss making risk covers; this move will also increase the tariffs.

 

Therefore, more primary general insurers will be pushed to spot markets in view of losses suffered by the global reinsurers. Spot reinsurance covers, or Facultative reinsurance refers to a reinsurance contract under which the primary insurer has the option to cede and the reinsurer has the option to accept or decline individual risks. FacRe contract are more expansive than treaty driven insurance hence, it will also have impact on domestic tariffs.

 

As per insurers current tariffs for fire and engineering risks are not sustainable, if underwriting margins are to be protected. Underwriting margins refers to the difference in the premium collected and claim paid out. In motor and health segments as well underwriting margins are negative.

Expected hike in global reinsurance rates will also increase your premium outgo

Insurance IndiaDue to catastrophes such as earthquakes in Japan and floods in Australia and Thailand global reinsurance companies have faced a big hit on their balance sheets in 2011; hence, they will increase their rates by 15-20% when policies will come to them for renewal from first January 2012.

 

Even though there is no catastrophe in India but still rates for Indian insurance companies will also go up. As after 9/11 attack in U.S.A. terrorism insurance rates increased across the world although attack happened in America.

 

Indian insurance companies will pass on this hike to their customers which mean your premium for insurance cover will perhaps rise.

 

Unlike western markets renewal programmed for Asia Pacific begins from first April.

 

Indian only reinsurer General Insurance corporation of India (GIC) had to suffer hit of Rs 900 crore on account of natural disasters in Japan, New Zealand, Thailand and Australia.

 

Treaty reinsurance is a reinsurance of insured exposures, which are accepted within the terms of the reinsurance contract which is called a treaty. There are two kinds of Treaty reinsurance i. e. proportional and non-proportional. In proportional treaties reinsurers pay for losses in the same proportion of premiums they receives, while in non-proportional treaties reinsurers pays amount greater than the threshold.

 

According to Swiss Re’s report total insured losses have doubled in 2011 as compared to previous year. During 2011 global insurance industry took a hit of $ 108 billion against $48 billion in previous year on account of natural catastrophes and man made disasters.

 

Claims from natural catastrophes reached worth of $ 103 billion for global insurance industry in 2011 against $ 43 billion in 2010.

 

For liabilities below 1,000 crore reinsurers have 70% share while for mega risks reinsurers have 90% of the share.