Bancassurance « Archives of Policy Mantra Blog
Tag Archives: Bancassurance

HDFC Life, Manulife Set To Bid For HSBC India Insurance Arm

hsbc insurance

Canada’s Manulife Financial Corp and HDFC Life, a joint venture between India’s top mortgage lender HDFC and British insurer Standard Life Plc, are among the suitors to place first-round bids for HSBC Plc’s Indian life insurance business. The stake is valued around $200 million.

HSBC, Europe’s biggest bank is selling its 26% stake in a life insurance joint venture with two Indian state-run banks – Canara bank ltd and Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) as it sheds it non-core businesses globally.

The winner of the auction will get immediate access to about 5,500 branches of the two state-run banks.

Bancassurance is emerging as a key tool to sell insurance products across Asia as the life insurance industry matures in the region.

HSBC’s two Indian partners in the joint venture – Canara bank and OBC – could also pare their stakes,. That could push the deal value to $800 million, including a bank distribution agreement.

The biggest attraction for any Indian or foreign bidder in this joint venture would be the vast distribution network, which is absolutely essential in a country like India.

There are a very few good partnership opportunities available for foreign players in India, this venture is one of them.

IRDA Fast Tracks Product Approval

Approval in 10 days

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is hard at work to expedite product approvals. IRDA has promised insurers to give product approvals within ten days.

The plan involves doing away with the practice of communicating through letters (a major reason for delays) and getting queries whatsoever answered over telephone.

The IRDA has promised for quick approval of products as insurers have to re-file the whole product basket to comply with new regulations.

Some pure insurance and other traditional plans complying with the new set of guidelines are set to get approval in a week’s time.

All insurers have started filing products soon after the guidelines got approved by Insurance Advisory Council.

IRDA rolled out the new norms for product design earlier this month. The guidelines have stipulated short deadlines of July and October 2013 for insurers to withdraw the existing products and float new sets of products.

By and large, the new portfolio of insurers will have 50% traditional plans and 30% unit-linked plans, with others bringing up the rest.

Meanwhile, following a representation given by the industry, the IRDA is also considering a setting up a four-member committee to review some provisions in the existing regulations that could hit the players. These include reviewing the commission structure for the sales through the bancassurance channel, including ‘credit life’ products, or policies which are bundled with loans given by banks. Currently, the commission payable to banks is capped at Rs 50,000 which hurts companies having more than one promoter bank.

Banks May Need Separate Arms For Insurance

bancassurance

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is mulling tweaking bancassurance guidelines by asking banks to form separate subsidiaries to act as insurance brokers.

At present, banks can act as insurance agents and are allowed to sell products of only one insurer.

A broker status would allow banks to sell products of multiple insurance companies.

The move comes after the announcement in the union budget that banks would be allowed to act as insurance brokers.

Bancassurance refers to tie-ups by banks to sell insurance products.

Banks will be ceased to be agents and not be able to sell insurance products directly if they choose to be brokers.

The proposal of forming subsidiary for broking operations have been mooted by an IRDA sub-committee which includes officials from Indian Banks Association and representatives from life and general insurance industries.

The committee is also looking into other operational difficulties in the model.

Bancassurance guidelines had earlier hit a roadblock following the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) concerns on reputation risk associated with such a model of distribution.

Many banks are also unhappy with the idea of banks as insurance peddlers. If the subsidiary mis-sells insurance products, the onus and other errors will still come on the bank.

Banks may not be interested to become insurance brokers as per the suggested way as they will face operational difficulties. Also, the fee income from distribution will flow to the subsidiary. It may not be a profitable proposition for banks.

Insurers say that opening up the banking channel will help non-bank promoted insurers to strengthen their distribution base. It is a welcome move. But many questions needs to be answered on the way of implementation and address the operational difficulties involved in the proposed model.

Insurance Sales By Banks To Come Under RBI Scanner

regulatory

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) may review the sales strategy employed by banks to encourage employees sell life insurance policies. Incentives for sale has come centre stage with the Cobrapost sting operation highlighting how front office staff takes extreme risks to sell a life insurance policy.

Also, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is considering allowing banks sell policies of multiple insurers, a move that might result in high commission products being pushed by banks.

Bankers say that officials exposed by the Cobrapost sting showed willingness to become accomplices in money laundering largely because of targets to sell life insurance plans.

Banks have been finding it difficult to sell life insurance following the loss of customer faith in the industry.

Although the commission is paid to the bank and not to the employee, private banks set targets and provide incentives to individuals for selling life insurance products.

While getting term deposits of Rs 10 lakhs is not a big deal for a branch, a prospect willing to invest up to Rs 10 lakhs in a life insurance plan would have enabled the branch manager his entire target. RBI may take up this issue in a forthcoming meeting with bank chief’s on risk-based supervision next week.

Private life insurance companies have been aggressively selling life insurance plans through branches. Branch managers are any how encouraging relationship managers to use moral suasion.

There have been instances when a bank’s official calls up a depositor and warn him that a cheque might be returned because of a small shortfall in his account even though he is not bound to make that call. It is at times like this, when the accountholder feels obliged to the banker that the sales pitch is made and the customer feels obliged to buy a policy.

Considering that all premium payments above Rs 40,000 have to mandatorily be received in cheque there is no way the bank could have booked the premium for a high value policy in cash. Bankers say that the only a bank employee could have collected cash and issued a high value policy would be by getting personally involved and converting the cash into cheque or demand draft through his own account.

Commissions in life insurance are very high and the bank stands to earn up to 20% of the premium amount. In the case of the deposits the only earning is the spreads that banks achieve in lending the funds, considering that spreads are in the region of 2%, for a bank the earning on an Rs 10 lakhs deposit be only Rs 30,000.

Banks Allowed to Act as Insurance Brokers

bancassurance

Finance minister, P. Chidambaram, has said that banks will be allowed to act as insurance brokers to increase insurance penetration in the country despite concerns expressed recently by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) against such a move.

The RBI in its recent Financial Stability Report has said that banks assuming the role of the insurance brokers might lead to conflict of interests, where the bank was also the promoter of an insurance company. Further, some provisions of the IRDA’s exposure draft on bancassurance, if implemented, may expose the banks to reputational risks.

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) in its draft norms on bancassurance had said that banks could become insurance brokers and sell multiple insurance companies products.

However, the insurance industry is skeptical of this becoming a reality and is awaiting clarity from RBI.

Insurers say that while the move to allow banks to become brokers was welcome, IRDA would have to announce the final bancassurance guidelines, with approval of RBI.  Also, there is an apprehension on whether banks would like to become brokers.

According to current rules, banks cannot tie-up with more than one life and non-life insurer each to sell their policies.

Will it be a Difficult Beginning for New IRDA Chairman?

IRDA

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) chairman, J. Hari Narayan has completed an eventful five year term. He will be remembered as someone who controlled the euphoria of insurers, came down heavily on mis-selling, cut agent commission but also saw the sector losing growth momentum because of a slew of stricter regulations.

New IRDA chairman is yet to be named. But experts believe that his priority should be restoring growth. Experts say that industry needs development to begin with. Regulations can come after IRDA has dealt with dwindling growth.

Following the stringent norms regarding Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) in September 2010, the country reported a fall in insurance density in 2011, a first since the sector was opened. There was an increase in insurance density for every year from 2001.

Similarly, insurance penetration had surged consistently till 2009 and slipped in the following years.

Insurance penetration and a deepening reach of insurance products, according to experts should be a continuing activity for the new chairman.

Insurance penetration is less than 4.5% and general insurance penetration is below 1%.

Perhaps, the most difficult task for the chairman would be to maintain a balance between customer welfare and insurer’s growth. Though J. Hari Narayan upheld the customer as supreme and based regulations on customer interest, those in the sector want the new chairman to uphold company growth as well.

Though products like micro insurance may be mandated by the IRDA chairman to serve customers, it is imperative to ensure the right mix in terms of prices and services of each product is maintained. Insurers say that this is required to ensure that their business interests are not hampered.

Insurance companies are looking at bancassurance as a channel of distribution to expand reach. At present, a bank is allowed to tie-up with one life and one non-life insurance company to sell its products. Insurers who entered the sector late lost on the opportunity. Hence, they are scouting for opening of the bancassurance architecture.

However, other institutions including Reserve Bank of India (RBI) have reservations about the IRDA model of letting banks act as agents. Hence, insurers fear that pushing these changes would be Herculean.

Areas such as catastrophe insurance are also expected to become a bone of contention between IRDA and the insurers. Offering mandatory insurance to cover catastrophic events and formulating a catastrophe pool is what some in the sector have been asking.

This has not been finalized, owing to a fear of it leading to a similar consequence as third party motor pool.

The equity investment cap for all insurers has been capped at 15%. While a separate equity investment limit of 30% for Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) has been permitted by the government, which owns it, the new chairman will have to clarify the IRDA’s stand on this matter.

Hari Narayan was open about his discomfort with this special status for LIC.

In life insurance products, after the regulatory changes, both ULIPs and pension plans are back to the market but volumes are still low. Experts say that a push from the regulator is needed. ULIPs are good products and insurers are hoping that new chairman will be able to increase commission on it for agents, so that they are incentivised to sell them.

However, while pending reforms might make it a difficult beginning for the new chairman, a lot of tedious work has already been completed by the outgoing chairman. Product guidelines, fixing the surrender charges for policies and altering the commission structure for agents, has been finalized and is on the way to become regulation. Similarly, the notification banning highest Net Asset Value (NAV) products of life insurers have been formulated and only needs to be gazetted.

LIC’s Investment Corpus Touched Rs 14.8 Trillion in December

LIC

The total investment corpus of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) has touched Rs 14.8 lakh crores (provisional) as of 31 December 2013 as against Rs 13.49 lakh crores at the end of December 2012, registering a growth of 10% in first nine months of this fiscal.

Investment in government securities accounted for a major chunk in LIC’s investments with investments worth Rs 7.27 lakh crores. Housing and infrastructure investments stood at Rs 1.91 lakh crores. And the rest included investments in the corporate sector and project loans.

Central government securities contributed Rs 4.77 lakh crores, followed by state government and other government guaranteed marketable securities.

Among housing and infrastructure investments, LIC has maximum amount of investments in the power sector, contributing Rs 94,294 crores.

This was followed by housing with Rs 41,900 crores. Other areas in infrastructure included irrigation, road, bridges, port and telecom.

LIC is expecting to invest a total of Rs 2.4 lakh crores in bonds, equities and government securities in the current financial year.

In terms of performance of different distribution channels, out of the first premium income, Rs 1,486 crores came from the chief life insurance advisor. Bancassurance and alternative channels contributed Rs 870.63 crores and direct marketing contributed Rs 218 crores.

Average Life Insurance Premium Fell 8% in FY’12: Study

Insurance Industry

The average premium per life insurance policy fell nearly 8% in FY’12 over the previous year, according to a study by consulting firm Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India.

The study on nine Indian private life insurers showed that those more than 8 years old managed to retain the ticket size of regular premium policies at around Rs 32,000 in FY’12, similar to that of the previous year.

On the other hand, the younger insurers saw a decline in the average ticket size of regular premium policies by 16% from around Rs 34,500 in FY’11 to about Rs 29,000 in FY’12.

Among all distribution channels, bancassurance continues to dominate in terms of getting the highest ticket size policies, followed by broking and direct channels: tells the study.

Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIPs) constituted 54% of the overall business mix of life insurers, with the rest being conventional and pure life insurance products.

Deloitte said that as insurers gradually shift focus to more traditional products and ticket sizes stabilize, insurers will need to find innovative combinations of channels, products and customer segments to achieve growth.

New Norms on Bancassurance Likely to be Delayed

bancassurance

Open architecture, or new bancassurance norms, which allow banks to sell products of more than one insurance company, are likely to be delayed till August 2013.

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) which has come out with draft guidelines and sought comments as well as suggestions from all stakeholders, is unlikely to finalize bancassurance rules any time shortly.

One reason for the delay is the change of guard at IRDA. IRDA Chairman J. Hari Narayan is due to retire in three weeks from now.

Open architecture norms will take at least six months to be finalized. Industry is also not ready before that.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has also expressed reservations about proposed bancassurance guidelines. In its financial stability report released last month, the RBI had said that the draft guidelines released by IRDA might expose banks to reputation risks.

While, bank-funded insurance joint venture companies are against open architecture, non-bank funded companies are strongly in favour of the linkage between banks and insurance companies.

According to IRDA’s exposure draft, banks can sell insurance products by playing either a corporate agent or a broker to insurance firms. Corporate agents can sell insurance products for only one insurer. A broker can sell multiple company’s products. Those opting for a broker will have to first withdraw from their existing bancassurance partnership.

RBI is in favour of limiting role of banks as an agent instead of broker.

Currently, bancassurance channel contributes to about 30-35% of new business premium for insurance companies.

IRDA Will Consider All Views before Finalizing Bancassurance Norms

bancassurance new

Even though, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has raised concerns about draft bancassurance norms, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has said that it will consider all views before finalizing the rules. IRDA is aiming to come out with final bancassurance guidelines by the first week of February 2013.

In its report on financial stability, RBI had said that the proposal to allow banks to become insurance brokers might lead to a conflict of interest in case the bank was also a promoter of an insurance company.

On the different views on the issue, IRDA chairman J. Hari Narayan said that banks should be allowed to act as agents for more than one insurer. He also added that as per insurance act, a distribution entity could be an agent only on a 1:1 basis.

IRDA had proposed a zonal model in which a bank could tie-up with partners for each zone.

Companies had said that they wanted to operate as agents to multiple companies across India. Under the current law, it is possible. But, they need to become brokers, not agents.

IRDA said that it wants to provide some flexibility to banks and it is up to banks to take decision.