July « 2012 « Archives of Policy Mantra Blog
Monthly Archives: July 2012

Maximum Complaints from Punjab: Insurance Ombudsman

GrievanceThe office of the Insurance ombudsman in Chandigarh has received maximum number of complaints against insurance companies from Punjab for the year 2011-12.

The body is set up by finance ministry. It is responsible for the reconciliation or settlement of grievances between complainants and insurance companies. This office is authorized to receive complaints from Haryana, Punjab, Chandigarh, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir.

For the year 2011-12 it received total 2,383 complaints as against 2,082 in 2010-11. Out of these 1,678 were against private sector insurers and 705 were against public sector insurers.

The complaints in life segment increased to 1,782 this year as against 1,268 last year. However, number of complaints in non-life segment decreased to 601 this year as compared to 814 last year.

Almost 91% of the complaints were received from Punjab followed by Haryana and Chandigarh.

Total 1,885 complaints were disposed off by the insurance ombudsman this year, including 254 cases of outstation hearings, as against the total 1,143 complaints which had been disposed off last year.

The average cost per complaint stood at Rs 3,342 in 2011-12 as compared to Rs 4,870 in 2010-11.

Of total cases reaching the office, 1,335 complaints found to be not entertainable and out of remaining 1,048, 78% were settled either by insurers themselves or by the way of the awards passed by the office.

The maximum number of complaints from Chandigarh were disputes involving premium paid or payable according to terms and conditions of the policy, these stood at 1,258. This was followed by 270 complaints regarding the partial or total repudiation of claims by an insurer.

There were 216 complaints pertaining to delay in settlement of claims by insurance companies.

The annual report 2011-12 of the insurance ombudsman highlighted common issues related to overwriting and customer service. These included the active involvement of the insured at the time of filling up of the form by being properly briefed about the terms and conditions of the policy.

The report also proposed that insurers say that customers should not hand over the cash premiums to the agent and they need to personalize their agents to avoid the wrongful selling of policies.

The report stated that most complaints arose due to unethical selling and unprofessional conduct of agents and observed that the insurance companies were not adhering to Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority’s (IRDA) agency guidelines, resulting in an increased number of complaints.

L&T General and Future Generali likely in talks for a Merger

l&t-and-future-generaliAs intense competition is squeezing profitability of insurers, L&T General insurance is planning to combine with a rival to create a bigger entity in the market. Merger may happen in medium term.

It is expected that L&T General is in talks with Future Generali General Insurance for a partnership.

The company is planning to hire 80 people in this quarter.

In first quarter of FY’13 company posted a growth of 80% on year-on-year basis. L&T have 100% stake in the L&T General Insurance. Earlier L&T was in talks with U. S. A. based Traveler’s for a partnership. However, talks did not turn out positive and L&T decided to go ahead with the venture on its own. Company started operations in 2010 with the initial capital of Rs 175 crore. The company is focusing on technology to reach out to customers.

Private Non-Life Insurers joined hands to bid for Air India Insurance Policy

Aeroplane InsurancePrivate non-life Insurance Companies have joined hands in response to the re-tender floated by Air India for its $ 8.6 billion aviation insurance policy that is coming up for renewal on 1st October 2012.

Air India operated by state-run National Aviation Company of India (NACIL) has lowered the minimum solvency requirement for the private non-life Insurance Companies to 1.3 times from 1.5 times earlier.

The technical bids that are submitted show two consortium of non-life Insurers emerge. The consortium of HDFC Ergo General Insurance and SBI General Insurance who had submitted technical bids earlier as one consortium have now joined hands with ICICI Lombard, and now three of them have submitted bid as one consortium.

Second consortium that has submitted bid include four public sector general insurers –New India Assurance (Lead Insurer), Oriental Insurance, National Insurance and United India Insurance.

As per insurers, they have submitted bids in consortium as re-insurers prefers a robust consortium of insurers and getting terms in the reinsurance market becomes easier if the consortium is strong.

Air India is the merged entity of erstwhile Air India and Indian Airlines including its subsidiaries and affiliated companies including joint ventures. Air India invited technical bids on 8 June 2012 for insuring its fleet value of $ 8.6 billion containing 152 aircrafts. It scrapped the three technical bids received from non-life insurance companies and called for re-tender on 16 July 2012. However, Air India did not clarify why it scrapped the three technical bids and called for re-tender.

Insurance Claim can also be granted without Service and Income Proof: Tribunal

Fines; Insurance ClaimThe Thane District Motor Accident Claim Tribunal has held that claim can be granted even if the proof of the service and income is not presented in the court by the claimant.

This decision of the tribunal has come while deciding a nine year old freak road accident case. The tribunal awarded a sum of Rs 2, 08,000 to Laxman Kashiram Pawar from a Pimplagoan village of Murbad taluka as a compensation for the accidental death of his 22 year old son Bhagwan in 2003.

Laxman told court Bhagwan was serving with Vinod Vitthal Patil and was earning a sum of Rs 3,000 per month.

Bhagwan met with an accident on 24 September 2003 when he was going as pillion rider on a motorcycle.

The owner of the motorcycle, Vinod Patil, and the insurance company with which bike was insured were the opponents in the case.

The claimants told the court that they were entitled of compensation of Rs 4, 50,000; however, for the purpose of court fee it was restricted to Rs 1, 00,000 only.

Applicant’s counsel told the court that both unknown vehicle and the motorcycle were involved in the accident and hence insurance company and motorcycle owner are liable to pay the compensation.

The tribunal stated that even though applicant has not filed any document on record to show that deceased was working with Vinod Patil and earning Rs 3,000 per month, but considering the age of the deceased and as deposed by the applicant that at the time of the accident, deceased was 22 year old, the tribunal held that the notional income of the deceased Rs 3,000 per month, can be taken in consideration.

Hence, tribunal granted a sum of Rs 1, 98,000 as a compensation for total loss of dependency and Rs 10,000 as funeral expenses.

Nippon Life Planning to Bring Post-Sales Services in Indian Insurance Market

Reliance-Life-InsuranceNippon Life is planning to bring the practice of post-sales services in Indian insurance market. Customer service activities plays an important part of Nippon Life’s insurance business in Japan and it wants to reciprocate the same in India.

As per Nippon Life, in Japan they make it rule that their all sales people visit every customer at least once a year. Such visits help in selling new products to existing customers and acquiring new customers.

Stressing the need for post-sales services, Nippon Life said that insurance is a long term product and customer’s needs might change over the period of time according to his age, marital status, size of the family etc. At each stage of life there is a need to review the current policy that the customer is enrolling therefore it is important for sales agent to periodically visit the customers to find out their diversifying needs in their various life stages.

Nippon Life is present in India through its joint venture with Reliance Life Insurance, in which it holds 26% stake. Reliance Life is a part of Anil Ambani led Reliance Group’s financial services arm Reliance Capital.

Post-sales service is a widely prevalent practice in a host of consumer-focused businesses such as consumer goods and home appliances.

Post-sales services involve continued relationship between company and its customers through maintenance and advice-like offerings for years after the actual sale.

However, post-sales services are not available in Indian insurance industry; although some other financial services segments like banking offer such services in form of financial advisory services for certain customers.

In the insurance sector, financial advice forms an important part at the time of signing up the customers, but it is up to the customers to seek any further service from the insurers after they have enrolled for their policies.

Insurers can’t go back on Policy once it’s Issued

Consumer protectionThe Delhi State Consumer Dispute’s Redressal Commission, has ruled that once an insurance company has issued a policy, it can’t later reject the policyholder’s claim on the ground that the cover was given in violation of terms and conditions.

This decision has come on the plea of Narayan Chimandas whose claim for medical expenses for treatment undergone while he was in U.S.A., was rejected by Oriental Insurance on the ground that he has not disclosed his history of heart decease.

Chimandas has bought an overseas travel insurance policy from Oriental Insurance. Chimandas said that he had disclosed his existing deceases while applying for the policy. And he was issued the policy only after a medical examination.

The commission said that insurance company was well awared while issuing the policy that Chimandas was suffering from heart decease and high blood pressure and now it can’t take the defense of pre-existing decease to reject his claim.

Hence, the commission directed Oriental Insurance to pay Rs 16.79 lakh to Chimandas towards his claim for medical expenses.

SEBI Maintains Profitability Criteria for Listing of Insurers

IRDA-SEBI-IPOSecurities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has said that there was no need to relax the three-year profitability criteria for listing of insurance companies.

A sub-group appointed by SEBI has said that insurers could still raise the capital through book-building.

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) had inquired SEBI if insurers could raise capital through fixed-price issues as insurers will find it difficult to fulfill profitability criteria because insurers require 6-7 years to break even.

SEBI panel has done away with the need for a monitoring agency to oversee how the money raised is deployed.

It recommended that insurers should raise capital only to fulfill capital adequacy requirements according to IRDA norms.

The sub-group said that detailed insurance industry specific risk factors should be the part of offer document.

The risks include claims arising out of catastrophe, faulty pricing leading to differences in future actual claims, deviations in mortality rates and regulatory restrictions on investment by insurers.

The general insurers are also required to emphasise the risks related to their inability to obtain reinsurance, regulated tariffs and increase in claim liability of motor third party due to court judgments.

SEBI panel has recommended that insurers should provide an overview of the insurance industry, disclose financial information according to IRDA format and familiarize investors with a glossary of insurance terms. SEBI has also recommended additional disclosures pertaining to business details such as distribution network, premium, persistency, investment yield, reinsurance and new business achieved profit.

SEBI has requested that either IRDA should amend the insurance laws to fall in line with SEBI ICDR regulations or keep specific additional compliances without there being a need to amend the general provisions of ICDR regulations.

As per experts, the recommendations of SEBI are likely to protect the investor’s interest due to greater disclosures and help in mitigating the conflict between the regulatory provisions of SEBI and IRDA.

Insurance-Linked Securities top $2 billion in Q2: Aon Benfield

Insurance linked securitiesThe latest report on Insurance Linked Securities (ILS) markets by Aon Benfield securities, the investment division of global reinsurance intermediary and capital adviser Aon benfield, reveals that the catastrophe bond issuance for the period reached to $2.1 billion as investors continued to deploy capital into the sector.

The report also said that ILS market is retaining strong momentum from Q1, where ILS issuance reached record levels with $1.5 billion of deals brought to markets, total of seven transactions closed during Q2 2012 featuring both new and repeat sponsors.

In contrast to the negative returns of Q1 2012, Aon benfield said that their ILS indices rebounded in Q2 to all post mark-to market gains. The All Bond and BB-rated bond indices increased by 2.74% and 2.49% respectively, while U.S.A. Hurricane bond and U.S.A. earthquake bond indices increased by 1.94% and 2.32% respectively during the period.

Aon Benfield securities also said that the Q2 ILS issuance were excellent, and brought the total issuance for the first half of 2012 very close to record levels. Issuance for the first half of 2012 stood at $3.6 billion, which was just short of the all time high of $3.8 billion achieved during the same period in 2007. It also said that pipeline for the remaining 2012 is also strong. And it is expecting healthy level of capital inflows from both new entrants and seasoned investors to the ILS sector.

Aon Benfield securities is maintaining the higher end of its Q1 2012 forecast that full year 2012 ILS issuance will be in the region of $6 billion.

Insurance Linked Securities Taking Larger Role in Catastrophe Reinsurance: Willis

IRDA to Widen Micro-Insurance Products and Its Distribution Network

Micro-insuranceIn a bid to boost the micro-insurance sector, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has proposed to widen the product portfolio and distribution network of micro-insurance.

To widen the distribution network of micro-insurance, IRDA has proposed to allow cooperative banks, regional rural banks, primary agricultural co-operative societies and individuals such as shopkeepers, medical store owners, petrol pump owners and public telephone operators to act as micro-insurance agents.

IRDA has noted that most of the products offered under this segment are basic ones, and mostly term assurance. Hence, IRDA has asked insurers to consider diversifying the micro-insurance portfolio by including saving-linked and health cover features.

IRDA also said that non-life retail segment of the micro-insurance business might not be attractive line of business at present, since it mainly covers individual risks such as dwelling, livestock, and tools which are yet to be considered insurable by these segments.

To cater to this segment IRDA has proposed an option of appointing micro-insurance agents either to any one sector of micro enterprises, small enterprises and medium enterprises, or to all three or any combination of two.

Similarly non-life insurers will also be allowed to appoint micro-insurance agents in these combinations either in the manufacturing sector or the service sector or in both.

The maximum premium under non-life micro-insurance policies is proposed to be pegged at Rs 25,000.

To encourage micro-insurance agents to maintain reasonable persistency, IRDA has proposed to link the agent’s persistency rate to remuneration allowed. IRDA has proposed renewal commission of 20% to those agents maintaining persistency rate of 50% at the end of preceding last two financial years. And other will get only 10% renewal commission.

IRDA Slapped Rs 5 lakh Fine on Bajaj Allianz Life

Bajaj allianzInsurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh on Bajaj Allianz Life insurance company for violating regulations pertaining to group unit-linked policies.

The penalty is imposed on Bajaj Allianz Life under section 102 (B) of Insurance Act, 1938. Insurer will have to pay the penalty within 15 days of receipt of the order.

IRDA has found Bajaj Allianz Life guilty of enrolling new members into existing group scheme, where master policy was issued prior to first September 2010 without revising the existing scheme as required by circular issued by 27 October 2010.

Bajaj Allianz Life enrolled new members into the existing group scheme (Bajaj Allianz Life group unit gain – a ULIP group insurance plan) issued to Yes Bank.

However, the company in its submission to the regulator said that by its action it has complied with the directions as given in the circular on a prospective basis and have not offered product for sale flouting circular, from first September 2010.