Monthly Archives: March 2011

Free Ride for Motor Cover Users to End

The free ride enjoyed by motor insurance claimants is about to end as government is filling the loopholes of current policy. Third-party claims for road accidents will be capped at Rs 10-15 lakh right now there is no cap in current policy but new norm will chance it. If the person driving the vehicle is at fault, the claim in the event of death could go up to Rs 15 lakh. If the driver is not at fault, Rs 10 lakh could be the maximum amount that could be claimed.

The average third-party claim per accidental death is Rs 3 lakh. For injury, it is Rs 1 lakh. Though cases of high claims are few, in some cases claims have gone up to Rs 20 lakh, depending on the profile of the affected person. There is no current timeframe to fill the time limit which will be reduced by three years.

All these changes are from the on suggestions by the insurance regulator. A Bill incorporating these changes is expected to be tabled in the next session of Parliament.

Some people delay filing claims to increase interest payments, there is an incentive to delay filing of claims. Apart from higher interest payments, this makes investigation difficult. A time limit will ensure prompt filing. Another suggestion is that the claim should be decided in the jurisdiction where the accident takes place. This means if the accident has happened in Maharashtra, the claims filed will be under the jurisdiction of the state authorities.

Last year, the surface transport ministry formed a 10-member committee under the chairmanship of S Sundar, a former secretary, to prepare a report, based on which the archaic provisions of the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act, 1988, were to be overhauled. The committee submitted its report last month. It has incorporated these three changes pertaining to motor insurance.

Life Insurance and Financial Security Both Go Hand in Hand

Life insurance is a preferred choice not only for long-term savings, but more importantly, to ensure financial security of the family in the unfortunate event of the demise of the breadwinner. While insurance can address multiple financial goals of an individual, its unique value proposition lies in the ‘protection’ element that it provides to an individual. An individual should first and foremost address his need for protection and make provision for the financial stability of his family before proceeding to plan for savings and wealth creation and Millions of people today have entrusted their savings to the life insurance industry and use it to fulfill their long-term financial goals.

The life insurance sector in India contributes significantly to economic development and nation-building by providing long-term funds. For the economic development of a nation, investments in core areas are necessary. The life insurance industry is a major instrument for the mobilization of savings of people, reaching out to middle- and lower-income groups and channelizing these funds towards the capital markets and infrastructure development. This industry has emerged as the largest and most relevant domestic institutional segment contributing to the stability of the capital markets owing to their sizable long-term equity flows. Given that India has a vast population that has been untouched by the benefits of banking and insurance, the life insurance industry has to increasingly play a prominent role in building a solid platform to enable further growth and infrastructure development.

Today, an individual has a bouquet of products to choose from to address his varied financial needs. Within this portfolio, ULIPs as a product category has found tremendous popularity and acceptance among consumers due to its dual benefits of protection and long-term wealth creation. Added to this is the flexibility it offers customers to structure it as per their financial goals and appetite for risk. With the introduction of the new regulatory guidelines from September 1, 2010, ULIPs now offer a better and improved value proposition to consumers. This will reinforce the trust of customers in life insurance.

India has exhibited a robust growth rate in the recent past and is surging ahead on the path of fiscal and economic reforms. The country has witnessed a shift towards an increasing working population with rising income levels, a higher disposable income and purchasing power, as well as an enhanced propensity to save. Consumption patterns have changed and consumers aspire to move up the value chain in terms of goods and services consumed. The robust economy has also spurred higher entrepreneurial abilities and opportunities. In this context, it is paramount for everybody to create a financial safety net to secure and protect their family as they strive for growth and development. Insurance is the only instrument that will be able to create this safety net for people to fall back on in times of exigencies. In a constantly changing world, only life insurance can provide that much-needed sense of security of financial welfare of the individual and his family.

FDI may be taken out of IRDA Act

The issue of taking out foreign direct investment (FDI) from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) Act of 1999 is not entirely a closed chapter. A new panel has been formed to check the requirements of FDI in current financial scenario. Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission (FSLRC) Chairman Justice B N Srikrishna is very optimistic about FDI issue and the said this issue will be flagged and examined properly. The government had last week set up a 10-member FSLRC to rewrite and clean up financial sector laws in tune with current times.

In IRDA act FDI limit has not been increased from 26% to 49% as this increment needs nod of parliament. Last time this proposal of limit increment was mooted by P Chidamabaram in his Budget speech for 2004-05 — the first Budget of the UPA government. But Bill was not tabled in front of parliament as Left front was not in favor of it. UPA government had put this bill in Rajya Sabha only after the Left withdrew its support in 2008. The Bill was then referred to the Standing Committee on Finance, where it has been pending since then.

Foreign investors have for too long been complaining about the 26 per cent FDI cap in the insurance sector, as foreign players would be able to increase their investments in their Indian joint ventures if the FDI limit is increased. Raising the FDI cap will enable agent-expertise and know-how transfer that are generally not available under the current regime. There are 24 general insurance companies and 23 life insurers in the country after the sector was opened in 2000. Foreign players such as Prudential Plc, ING Group, Allianz and Aviva are already present here with their Indian partners.

Together with banking services, insurance services add about seven per cent to the country’s gross domestic product and insurance is growing with the rate of 15-20 per cent yearly.

HT-MARs Survey on Non Life Insurer

HT-MaRS survey gave the public sector National Insurance Company (NIC) ranked third coming after private sector Tata AIG and ICICI Lombard. This survey on customer satisfaction, customer servicing and interaction was measured using six parameters – product enquiry stage, purchase transaction, policy issuance, hospital network, renewal, and transparency. The survey was carried out among 2074 medical insurance policy holders in eight major cities of India — Delhi, Lucknow, Kolkata, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Chennai, Bangalore and Hyderabad.

The main reason of third poison is claims settlement takes longer in NIC compared to its competitors but positive point is reasonable pricing which makes NIC a good option. The four PSU insurers — National Insurance Company, New India Assurance, Oriental Insurance and United India Insurance — which together manage about Rs 6,000 crore of health insurance business, complain about being saddled with a commercially unviable claims settlement ratio of 115%. They have to say that the way TPAs function also has a major bearing on customer satisfaction, and forming a common TPA is one way of cutting down on costs. TPAs are intermediaries between patients and insurance firms.

In contrast to public companies’ low grade in claim settlement private players are well ahead in this filed. Star Health & Allied Insurance is best in term of terms of settlement of mediclaim policies according to this survey. Star Health & Allied Insurance Company along with a few other companies have a single window clearance mechanism which reduces the settlement to less than a week. Star Health is a standalone health insurance company.

Industry experts said that once the regulatory issues including the foreign direct investment (FDI) norms are addressed, several more standalone health insurance companies will foray into India. The Insurance Amendment Bill, which is pending in Rajya Sabha, seeks to enhance the cap on FDI in private insurers from the current 26% to 49%.

An Introduction to New Pension Scheme

Author: Nelson Dlima

The New Pension Scheme (NPS) is a direct contribution scheme launched by Govt. of India in 2004. Primarily it was for government employee but from 2009 it has been made available to all citizens of India. This product has been launched with the idea to reduce the pension liability of the Govt. of India.

Any citizen of India who is in age range of 18-60 years is eligible to join the NPS. Two types of accounts are available for the members – Tier 1 (available from 1-5-2009) and Tier 2. Under the former early withdrawals are not allowed while the latter gives the permission to do so.

Tier 1 is mandatory for all Government employees joining employment on or after 1-1-2004. 10% of the (Basic, DP and DA) is contributed from the employees’ monthly pay. Government makes a matching contribution. In addition to this Tier 1 account each individual can have a Tier2 account at his option which gives the option of early withdrawals.

Contribution:

The following contribution guidelines have been set by the PFRDA:

  • Minimum amount per contribution: Rs500 per month
  • Minimum number of contributions: 4 in a year (at least 1 in each quarter)
  • Minimum annual contribution: Rs 6,000 in each subscriber account.
  • Member can make contributions of Rs 6,000 or more once a year. However, it is recommended to make much larger contributions.

If the subscriber is unable to contribute the minimum annual contribution, a default penalty of Rs.100 per year of default would be levied and the account would become dormant. In order to re-activate the account, subscriber will have to pay the minimum contributions, along with penalty due. A dormant account will be closed when the account value falls to zero.

  • An annual charge of Rs340 is levied towards maintenance of the account, Rs45 at the time of any transaction to and fro the account.

There is talk to the annual charge falling to Rs280 and transaction cost declining as well once the scheme touched 100,000 subscribers.

  • Fund Management charge is a meager 0.009% of the money invested.

Investments:

Under the investment guidelines finalized for the NPS, pension fund managers will manage three separate schemes, each investing in a different asset class. The three asset classes are equity, government securities and credit risk-bearing fixed income instruments. The subscriber will have the option to actively decide as to how the NPS pension wealth is to be invested in three asset classes:

  1. E Class: Investment would primarily in Equity market instruments. It would invest in Index funds that replicate the portfolio of either BSE Sensitive index or NSE Nifty 50 index.
  2. G Class: Investment would be in Government securities like GOI bonds and State Govt. bonds
  3. C Class: Investment would be in fixed income securities other than Government Securities
  • Liquid Funds of AMCs regulated by SEBI with filters suggested by the Expert Group
  • Fixed Deposits of scheduled commercial banks with filters
  • Debt securities with maturity of not less than three years tenure issued by bodies: Corporate including scheduled commercial banks and public financial institutions, Credit Rated Public Financial Institutions/PSU Bonds, Credit Rated Municipal Bonds/Infrastructure Bonds

In case the subscriber does not exercise any choice as regards asset allocation, the contribution will be invested in accordance with the ‘Auto choice’ option. In this option the investment will be determined by a predefined portfolio. At the lowest age of entry (18 years) the auto choice will entail investment of 50 % of pension wealth in “E” Class, 30% in “C” Class and 20% in “G” Class. These ratios of investment will remain fixed for all contributions until the participant reaches the age of 36. From age 36 onwards, the weight in “E” and “C” asset class will decrease annually and the weight in “G” class will increase annually till it reaches 10% in “ E”, 10% in “C” and 80 % in “ G” class at age 55.

Till the of age 35 years At age 55 Years
E Class 50% 10%
C Class 30% 10%
G Class 20% 80%
  • Unique 16 digit permanent retirement account number which the employee can retain when they change jobs, asset classes, fund managers etc.
  • PFRDA has appointed 6 fund managers to manage the NPS corpus.
  • In case of exit before the age of 60, the member HAS to purchase a life annuity from an IRDA life insurer using 80% of the accumulated savings, remaining 20% can be taken away as a lump sum.
  • In case of exit after 60, the aforementioned ratio changes to 60:40.

Though withdrawals under the NPS attract tax under the EET system, EEE method of taxation has been proposed.

At present, individuals typically save taxes on income of up to 100,000 rupees per year, by buying unit-linked insurance plans (a type of life insurance which also invests in the stock market) or equity-linked mutual funds.

In the new tax regime, any withdrawals from the New Pension Scheme will be tax-free. In addition, if your employer contributes up to 10% of your salary to the pension program, that too will be tax-free. At the moment, it would be considered additional income and taxed.

The pension program has one major advantage over provident funds — it allows you to invest some part of your savings in stocks, which can potentially deliver much higher returns than the 8%-odd fixed return of the provident fund.

Consolidation could be seen in Life Insurance

An international actuarial and consulting firm Milliman, it has warned that there is a sharp drop in investments by promoters of Indian life insurance companies and it said that some of them may either sell or close their companies to new business given capital constraints.

Investments have halved from Rs 8170 crore in ’08-09 to Rs 4152 crore in ’09-10. In the current fiscal (April 2010 till date), investment has again been half of the previous fiscal at Rs 2156 crore. Investment by promoters of Indian life insurance companies has been consistently dropping since the global financial crisis in 2008 although most companies are still to achieve break-even and are still in need of capital.

The main reasons for this are a general paucity of capital after the global economic downturn along with the cautious approach taken by Indian insurers in light of a slowdown in new business volumes, high expense levels, and delayed break-even targets. According to the report, the recent IRDA guidelines capping charges on unit-linked products that were introduced on September 2010 may also have had a significant impact on promoters’ desire to invest significant capital into the business in the near future. This is likely to impact the level of capital infusion in the near future until promoters gain greater confidence around the regulatory environment and revise their strategies accordingly.

Promoters are questioning the merits of diverting available capital away from their core businesses to their life insurance businesses, where the break-even targets may now be further delayed following the recent regulatory developments.

The industry could get some relief in terms of capital if the foreign direct investment limits are raised or if companies are allowed to raise capital through an initial public offering. However, the regulation in respect of both these routes of capital mobilization has been delayed. The only option left for promoters is to raise capital through the private equity route at the holding company level. However, even in this route there are challenges because promoters value their companies much higher than private equity investors.

Life Insurer Sitting on Rs 41,500 cr cash

Source: Financial Chronicle

With the tightened monetary policy interest rates are keeping high, life insurers are just waiting for the right time to invest the already piled up cash of Rs 41,500 crore.

High interest rates are too attractive for insurers to invest their money anywhere else and interest incomes are on all time high and seems it’s not stopping here. RBI has said that interest rates are not going to lower in the near future.

Life insurers pump thousands of crores of rupees into the equity market every year, and total investment now stands above Rs 4,13,000 crore.

Unit-linked insurance plans (ULIPs), which dominate their sales, have a big investment component. In ULIPs, 100 per cent of the premium can be invested in equities and the investment choice and the risk lie with the investor.

However, according to data from the Life Insurance Council, fresh investment in equities by companies fell to Rs 21,580 crore in April-December 2010 from Rs 47,470 crore a year ago. Insurers say the return on debt products is more attractive compared with equities.

Of the Rs 21,580 crore, LIC invested Rs 9,889 crore in equity compared with Rs 26,273 crore a year ago.

Indian Bank Keen to Foray into Life Insurance

Indian Bank has formally initiated the process foraying into the Life Insurance sector by invitation of request for proposal (RFP) from consultants to help in this cause. Indian Bank was approached by a few foreign players and domestic players to partner it in the life insurance foray.

Indian bank has a bancassurance division through which it sells life insurance, non-life insurance and mutual fund products. Indian Bank’s bancassurance pact with HDFC Standard Life Insurance comes to an end by this month while its non-life bancassurance pact with United India Insurance would continue according to company officials.

Life Insurance market in India is booming and now in total it has 23 players. The first year premium collected by the life insurance firms saw a 23% jump to Rs 1,03,875 crore during the April-February 2011 period against Rs 83,889 crore in the corresponding period the previous year. But there has been an 8% drop in the number of policies sold, to 3.91 crore for the period April-February 2011 against 4.26 crore sold in the corresponding period the previous year. This has largely been attributed to the confusion relating to ULIP sales and the subsequent imposition of stiff regulations.

Indian Bank feels that full potential of life insurance market can be felt only with a different entity and with a view to participate in the growth of the life insurance industry, the bank will like to rope in a suitable partner for undertaking this business.

Buffet’s Optimism on Insurance Sector in India

Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and regarded as the world’s most successful investor ever, feels India is a logical investment destination despite the 26% FDI cap in the insurance sector. Buffett said that he was looking at investing more money in large countries like India and Indian market is as big as other developed markets like UK and Germany. Buffett said the United States was recovering economically and added that if the Chinese and Indian economies continued to grow, it will reflect well on the US economy.

As part of its India entry, Buffet’s Berkshire American conglomerate has incorporated Berkshire India to sell and distribute general insurance products in India. Berkshire India would directly sell insurance product of Bajaj Allianz through its portal and by way of telemarketing.

He gave his great advice to Indian investors he said, “Invest in what you understand… Don’t go outside your circle of confidence… Don’t just buy and sell. Look for durability of the business and quality of management while you invest. However, it would be preposterous to give an opinion on the Indian economy just two hours after landing in the country.”

Berkshire Hathaway is a conglomerate that has interests in various businesses, including real estate, casualty insurance and reinsurance, finance, manufacturing and retailing. The company, which at the end of last year was sitting on $38 billion of cash equivalent, had bought US specialty chemicals maker Lubrizol for $9 billion recently.

Govt Nod Must for Reliance Life to Sell 26% to Nippon

Source: Business Standard

Anil Ambani group firm Reliance Life, which recently announced selling 26% stake to Japanese insurer Nippon for $680 million, will have to seek government nod, said the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA).

Under the Insurance Act, promoters wanting to sell 26% stake (maximum permissible limit), could offload their equity only after 10 years into operations. However, Reliance Life has not yet completed 10 years of operation.

IRDA Chairman J Hari Narayan said Reliance Life cannot sell its 26% stake currently without approval of the government. In response Reliance Capital’s spokesman said they are confident of receiving necessary approvals from the government, IRDA, RBI for the largest ever proposed FDI of Rs 3,000 crore in financial service sector in India.

IRDA chairman on his part said Reliance Life is in touch with the insurance watchdog over the issue and the company has to approach the government for approval.