Policy Mantra Blog

IRDA Assures Steps To Address Insurance Broker’s Concerns

Minimum Alternate Tax

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has assured the broking community that it will address issues raised by them such as high penalties, short term licenses and service tax on reinsurance brokers.

Brokers have demanded a reduction in penalties. They have argued that as their size is smaller as compared to an insurance company, they can’t be treated on the same footing as insurers while imposing penalties.

Brokers have also been asking to have long term licenses for brokers. According to the Insurance Act, 1938, a broker’s license is valid for only three years, after which it has to be renewed.

While IRDA has expressed solidarity in resolving this issue, the Insurance Act will have to be amended and the insurance bill passed in parliament for the changes to come into force. The broking community is also looking at approaching the parliamentary committee on finance to resolve the issue.

Another issue raised by brokers is related to service tax. Till last year, there was no service tax imposed on insurance brokers. However, in July 2012, it was decided that reinsurance brokers would also come under the purview of service tax. Brokers say that it will eat away their profits as a large percentage of it would be utilized to pay service taxes.

This issue too, since is a taxation issue, will have to be resolved by the finance ministry, and the broking officials are planning to take it up with the ministry.

The draft report by the IRDA committee on insurance broking has suggested certain amendments to the insurance broking regulations. While the ceiling on business from one client has been increased to 50%, the period for re-application for license by broker has been set at after one year from date of cancellation.

IRDA Sets Norms For Foreign Branches Of Insurers

guidelines

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has issued guidelines for insurance companies wanting to open subsidiaries/branch offices outside India.

According to the norms, an insurer should be making profits for the last three years out of the five years of operations and having a clean regulatory compliance track.

The minimum net worth for opening a foreign subsidiary/branch should be Rs 500 crores for domestic life insurance company, Rs 250 crores for a non-life insurance company and Rs 750 crores for a reinsurance company, besides having the prescribed solvency. The insurer should also have a board resolution for opening a foreign office.

Defining a foreign insurance company, IRDA said that it shall mean a company registered outside India whose paid-up capital is subscribed to by an Indian insurance company and shall include a foreign subsidiary company, where the Indian insurer holds more than 50 % of its paid-up capital, or is in a position to control the composition of its board of directors.

This would also include a branch office of the Indian insurer, which means any establishments described as a branch by the company, or any establishment carrying on either the same or substantially the same activity as that carried on by the head of the company.

The nature of business that would be transacted in the foreign insurance company should be the same for which the Indian insurance company has been granted the certificate of registration by IRDA.

The initial and further augmentation of capital and liabilities should be met out of the shareholder’s funds beyond solvency margin requirement and the company should be complying with Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) guidelines besides complying to host company solvency requirements.

Indian insurers at the beginning of every year should review the underwriting limits delegated to the foreign branch office and depending on the financial net worth, exposures and business plan have the limits approved by the board of directors and filed with the authority.

The underwriting policy for the foreign branches should be duly approved by the board of directors. The Indian insurer should have a mechanism to review the delegated powers of functionaries at the overseas branches as regards adequacy of such powers to meet market opportunities and timely business response needs.

In case the domestic insurer wants to close its foreign insurance company (including branch office), it would require the approval of IRDA subject to compliance to the host country rules and regulations.

The investment policy and reinsurance arrangements proposed for the foreign branches should be approved by the insurer’s board. The board would be responsible for monitoring the functioning of the operation of the foreign insurance company (including branch office) at regular levels and report to the authority any event/development that can impair the functioning of the foreign insurance company (including branch office).

Renewal Premiums Boost Insurer’s AUM

orphan-insurance-policy

Large private life insurers may be witnessing sluggish first time policy sales but their Assets Under Management (AUM) are rising, as fewer customers discontinue with their policies owing to the higher penalty being imposed by companies.

For FY’13, the AUM of SBI Life Insurance was Rs 51,912 crores, up 11% from a year ago. Similarly, HDFC Life saw its AUM grow 24% to Rs 40,108 crores while that of Max Life 19% to Rs 20,458 crores.

The industry’s new business premium income, however, declined 6.32% in FY’13 on year-on-year basis to Rs 1, 07,010 crores.

The AUM has gone up as a result of old savings. The increase in AUM is helped by increase in renewal premium income leading to better business quality. Renewal premium of most companies grew more than their new business income.

ICICI Prudential’s AUM stood at Rs 74,164 crores in FY’13 compared with Rs 70,771 crores a year ago. Bank-led companies are leading not only in quantum of profits, market share and ranks, but also in terms of AUM and statutory premiums. Bank-led companies have also seen better persistency and business quality.

Reliance Life saw its AUM drop to Rs 18,189 crores against Rs 18,767 crores in the previous fiscal.

Traditional Medicine Finds Place In Mediclaim

Health Insurance

In a move that would further bolster the prospects of the Indian traditional medicines which are being increasingly used for critical illnesses including those related to tumors and heart diseases, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has issued a notification for the inclusion of the non-allopathic system in the mediclaim insurance policies.

The alternate medicine system in the country forms an important part in the government’s health flagship programme, National Rural Health Programme (NRHM). Alternative treatments are referred to as Ayush (Ayurveda, Unani, Sidha and homeopathy).

However, as per the notification, insurance coverage will be provided only if non-allopathic treatments are taken in a government hospital or any institute recognized by government and or is accredited by Quality Council of India (QCI), National Accreditation Board on Health (NABH) or any other suitable institutions.

While several health insurance majors such as Apollo Munich, Reliance General Insurance and Bajaj Allianz General are already providing cover for alternative treatment in a limited way, the IRDA’s recent notification is expected to encourage many others to follow suit.

Till now many private insurance companies have been reluctant in covering ayurvedic treatments as parameters of these treatments doesn’t match with the main stream medicines and diseases and they even do not have standard pricing.

Ayush department is now drafting specifications for ayurvedic treatment that can be reimbursed like any other treatment. It is also setting standards for alternative medical hospitals so that it can be covered by private health insurers.

Indian Bank Eyeing Stake In An Insurance Company

Non-Life Insurance

Chennai based Indian Bank is considering owning a stake in a life insurance company. It wants to pick up 20-25% stake in an insurance company so that it will have a share in its profits.

Bank is looking at an insurance company with significant presence in areas where the bank has strong presence. Banks has said that three or four banks has approached it and are willing to give it equity free of cost. Indian Bank will float a request for proposal soon.

Free equity is not allowed as per insurance regulations. But an insurance company can offer discounted equity to banks and the discount in the share price has to be treated as advance commission and amortised over a period not extending beyond three years.

Existing insurance regulations allows a bank to sell products of one life insurance Company and one non-life insurance company only. While the final bancassurance guidelines are still awaited from Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), many life insurers have been requesting IRDA to allow banks to have tie-ups with multiple insurers.

Currently, the insurance industry with 24 life insurers is categorised into three groups. The first category includes insurers promoted by banks, for example ICICI Prudential Life, HDFC Life, ING Vysya Life, SBI Life, IndiaFirst Life, Star Union Dai-Chi Life and Canara HSBC OBC Life.

The second category consists of insurers not promoted by banks but have distribution tie-ups with them, for example Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), TATA AIG, Birla Sun Life and Bajaj Allianz. In the third category insurers, banks are neither promoters nor distribution partners, for example Aegon Religare, Future Generali, Shriram Life, DLF Pramerica and Bharti Axa.

Several life insurance companies are desperate to rope-in banks as distribution partners and are even ready to pay upfront money. In doing so, an insurer gets ready access to the customer base of the bank through its large branch network and a cost-effective distribution setup.

According to analysts, as per thumb rule, the cost of a retail agency, corporate agency and broking channel is 1.2 to 1.5 times a bancassurance channel, where bank staff sells insurance policies along with normal banking products.

In Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and many European countries, the bancassurance channel is most cost-effective. There have been quite similar deals between banks and insurance firms in recent time. PNB bought 30% stake in MetLife insurance. In 2010, Axis bank bought 4% stake in Max Life. According to the arrangement, Axis Bank will distribute Max Life’s insurance policies for ten years with effect from first May 2010.

Providing equity to a bank ensures that it is locked to sell the insurer’s policies over a longer term. Life insurance companies are capital starved and a bank buying into it will not only bring in capital but also push insurance products to its customers. Banks benefit by participating in the insurance growth story.

Finance Minster, P. Chidambaram announced in the budget that the banks would be permitted to act as insurance brokers so that their branches could be used to increase insurance penetration. Being an insurance broker allows a bank to sell policies of multiple insurance companies. However, the remuneration is lower as a broker.

Oriental Insurance Scraps Covers For 3 Tainted IPL Players

IPL Spot Fixing

Following the Indian Premier League franchise –Rajasthan Royals – terminating the contracts of its three players on spot fixing charges, the franchise’s official insurer Oriental Insurance too has canceled the insurance covers given to the trio.

After taking the nod from the franchise, Oriental Insurance has cancelled the policy of three players. This is because if the players are jailed or something untoward happens to them, there would be claims.

The trio was insured for a personal accident insurance policy, medical insurance policy and baggage insurance.

S Sreesanth has a personal accident cover of Rs 18 crores, a medical insurance policy of $1 million and baggage insurance of Rs 2,00,000. In case of a mishap, the medical insurance policy even allows an auctioned player to air lifted and flown to a foreign country for medical treatment.

The other two players – Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan has a personal accident insurance of one crores, medical insurance of Rs 5 lakh and baggage insurance of Rs 2, 00,000.

The insurance covers had commenced from March 25 and would end on May 31, after the finals.

The three players were arrested last week on charges of spot-fixing in the ongoing IPL matches.

Max Life Profit Up 17% In FY’13

Max Life Insurance

Private insurer, Max Life Insurance has reported a rise of 17% in profit before tax at Rs 860 crores in FY’13 as against Rs 733 crores in FY’12.

Its gross written premium grew 4% to Rs 6,639 crores in FY’13 as against Rs 6,391 crores in FY’12.

First year premium collection dropped meager 0.4% at Rs 1,899 crores in FY’13.

In view of all round performance in 2012-13, the company declared a total shareholder dividend of Rs 259 crores including an interim dividend of Rs 99 crores.

IRDA To Share Information With Global Peers On Insurance Sector

share information

Strengthening its international co-operation, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has joined its hands with some of its global peers for sharing and exchange of sectoral information.

IRDA has become a signatory to the global supervisory cooperation and information exchange agreement under the aegis of International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS).

There are now 37 jurisdictions admitted as signatories to the IAIS Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MMoU), representing more than 54% of worldwide premium volumes.

The pact is a global framework for co-operation and information exchange between insurance supervisors. Besides, it sets minimum standards for signatories.

Through membership in the MMoU, jurisdictions are able to exchange relevant information with and provide assistance to other member jurisdictions, thereby promoting the financial stability of cross-border insurance operations for the benefit and protection of consumers.

Joining the MMOU will further strengthen the supervisory role of the IRDA in the home jurisdiction. Other signatories to this pact include Australia, France, Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom. IAIS represents insurance regulators and supervisors spread across more than 200 jurisdictions.

A Bank Should Have Only One Broking License: IRDA Panel

IRDA

A corporate bank should be allowed to have only one insurance broking license, a panel set up by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has said.

The committee, constituted by the IRDA to review the IRDA Broking Regulations 2002, submitted its report a couple of weeks ago.

As of now, banks are allowed to be corporate agent for only one insurer and there has been a demand to allow them to sell products of more than one insurer. The panel’s view assumes significance as a decision is pending with the regulator.

While pointing out that functioning of banks as insurance brokers would help increase insurance reach, it pointed out that there could be conflict of interest when a bank forms a broking firm as they are also promoters of some insurance companies.

The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) position on banks as broking firm also needs to be ascertained as it is the primary regulator of banks, the panel suggested. The broking arm of banks should be an independent, account unit to be manned by exclusive staff trained by institutes imparting insurance related education.

The banks should have a board-approved policy in place to address the issues related to conflict of interest and the same should be filed with the authority, it said.

On sub-broking, the committee said it should be allowed for all insurance products and not merely retail personal products. Small banks such as cooperative banks and regional rural banks should be allowed as sub-brokers. There should be cap of Rs 1 lakh premium on policies to be procured by the sub-brokers, it said.

On the whole, the panel was in favour of bancassurance channel. As they are separately regulated by RBI, there may be enhanced efficiency in insurance business and higher accountability to the policyholder as compared to the agency channel, it said.

Banks accounted for 11.25% of total new business premium collected by life insurers during FY’12. The share was 36% for private life insurers and 1.51% for Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC).

Reliance Life Eyes 10% Growth In Premium Income This Fiscal

Reliance-Life-Insurance

Private sector life insurer, Reliance Life expects to maintain a 10% growth in total premium income on the back of growth in regular premium policies and better policy renewals.

By keeping in regular touch with existing policyholders and charting out a growth path for agents, the company aims to achieve double digit business growth during the current fiscal.

Reliance Life reported a Profit Before Tax of Rs 380 crores and mopped up total premium of Rs 4,020 crores for FY’13.

Currently, traditional life insurance products accounts for 80% of its total product portfolio, while Unit-Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) accounts for the rest.

The company recently launched a ‘career agency’ format, offering a fixed stipend and variable commission payout for its 1.25- lakh agents. The company wants to focus on its strength, which is its agency channel. The company said that it wants to be the alternative to Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in the private sector.

Reliance Life, as a late entrant in the life insurance industry, does not have a bancassurance tie-up (banks acting as corporate agents for distribution of insurance products) with any big bank.

Bancassurance accounts for 30% of the premium income for private insurers. However, for Reliance Life it is miniscule on this account.

As per current Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) regulations, one bank can tie-up with only one insurance company for bancassurance. In the Union budget this year, the Finance Minister announced that banks will be allowed to become insurance brokers which will enable them to sell policies of multiple insurance companies. Life insurance companies with existing tie-ups with banks could potentially lose some percentage of their business once banks become brokers.